French American Indian vs Immigrants from Honduras Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 101,898,195 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Honduras within French American Indian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.562. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in French American Indians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 1.177% in Immigrants from Honduras. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 French American Indians corresponds to an increase of 1,176.8 Immigrants from Honduras.

When considering income, the most significant differences between French American Indian and Immigrants from Honduras communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($85,899 compared to $77,328, a difference of 11.1%), median family income ($92,872 compared to $83,618, a difference of 11.1%), and median male earnings ($50,611 compared to $45,787, a difference of 10.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($48,977 compared to $48,267, a difference of 1.5%), householder income over 65 years ($54,699 compared to $51,888, a difference of 5.4%), and median female earnings ($36,920 compared to $34,647, a difference of 6.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between French American Indian and Immigrants from Honduras communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (5.5% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 34.3%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.5% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 26.0%), and family poverty (10.2% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 23.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (17.4% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 1.7%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (22.3% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 2.2%), and single female poverty (24.6% compared to 25.5%, a difference of 4.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between French American Indian and Immigrants from Honduras communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.2% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 9.6%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.3% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 8.7%), and female unemployment (5.5% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 8.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.2% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 0.39%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.3% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.57%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.0% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.81%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between French American Indian and Immigrants from Honduras communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.8% compared to 35.2%, a difference of 13.2%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.1% compared to 65.8%, a difference of 2.7%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (76.8% compared to 74.9%, a difference of 2.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (83.2% compared to 83.3%, a difference of 0.0%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.1% compared to 83.7%, a difference of 0.44%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (78.2% compared to 78.7%, a difference of 0.65%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between French American Indian and Immigrants from Honduras communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.9% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 19.1%), single father households (2.6% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 9.3%), and births to unmarried women (36.6% compared to 39.3%, a difference of 7.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (13.2% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 2.5%), family households (62.4% compared to 64.2%, a difference of 2.8%), and average family size (3.20 compared to 3.36, a difference of 5.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between French American Indian and Immigrants from Honduras communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.4% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 12.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 12.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.1% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 10.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.8% compared to 88.3%, a difference of 1.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.5% compared to 51.8%, a difference of 7.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.1% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 10.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between French American Indian and Immigrants from Honduras communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.1% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 50.0%), doctorate degree (1.6% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 15.7%), and college, under 1 year (62.4% compared to 56.5%, a difference of 10.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.0% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 1.2%), kindergarten (98.0% compared to 96.8%, a difference of 1.2%), and 1st grade (98.0% compared to 96.8%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between French American Indian and Immigrants from Honduras communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.6% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 29.4%), disability age 18 to 34 (8.2% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 28.2%), and male disability (13.4% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 19.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 65 to 74 (25.8% compared to 25.9%, a difference of 0.30%), cognitive disability (17.9% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 0.75%), and vision disability (2.5% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 0.94%).