Immigrants from Oceania vs Immigrants from Ethiopia Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 163,506,895 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Ethiopia within Immigrant from Oceania communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.318. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Oceania within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.061% in Immigrants from Ethiopia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Oceania corresponds to a decrease of 61.3 Immigrants from Ethiopia.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Immigrants from Ethiopia communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (25.6% compared to 21.6%, a difference of 18.9%), median female earnings ($40,297 compared to $42,744, a difference of 6.1%), and median earnings ($47,617 compared to $48,924, a difference of 2.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median household income ($89,100 compared to $88,687, a difference of 0.47%), median family income ($106,453 compared to $106,969, a difference of 0.49%), and median male earnings ($55,712 compared to $55,434, a difference of 0.50%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Immigrants from Ethiopia communities in the United States are seen in single father poverty (15.4% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 14.9%), single male poverty (12.4% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 8.5%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (13.5% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 7.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male poverty (11.2% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 0.070%), female poverty (13.3% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 0.28%), and poverty (12.3% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 0.40%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Immigrants from Ethiopia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.5% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 9.2%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.1% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 8.3%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.4% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 7.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.22%), female unemployment (5.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.63%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 0.73%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Immigrants from Ethiopia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (65.5% compared to 69.4%, a difference of 6.0%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.3% compared to 82.1%, a difference of 3.4%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.1% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 3.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (37.9% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 1.8%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.1% compared to 77.5%, a difference of 1.8%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.2% compared to 86.1%, a difference of 2.3%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Immigrants from Ethiopia communities in the United States are seen in married-couple households (46.9% compared to 43.1%, a difference of 9.0%), family households (64.9% compared to 61.2%, a difference of 6.0%), and single mother households (6.3% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 5.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (28.1% compared to 27.8%, a difference of 1.2%), average family size (3.29 compared to 3.25, a difference of 1.3%), and divorced or separated (11.9% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Immigrants from Ethiopia communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 33.0%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.8% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 21.9%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (57.5% compared to 53.0%, a difference of 8.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.4% compared to 89.6%, a difference of 0.85%), no vehicles in household (9.7% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 7.2%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (57.5% compared to 53.0%, a difference of 8.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Immigrants from Ethiopia communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.9% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 23.2%), master's degree (14.7% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 22.2%), and professional degree (4.6% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 16.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 12th grade, no diploma (90.9% compared to 90.9%, a difference of 0.020%), high school diploma (88.8% compared to 88.9%, a difference of 0.070%), and 11th grade (92.2% compared to 92.1%, a difference of 0.14%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Immigrants from Ethiopia communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.2% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 19.0%), self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 13.7%), and ambulatory disability (6.1% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 13.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (5.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.98%), cognitive disability (17.6% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 1.7%), and disability age over 75 (48.0% compared to 46.8%, a difference of 2.6%).