Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Immigrants from Ethiopia Community Comparison
COMPARE
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia
Immigrants from Ethiopia
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia
Immigrants from Ethiopia
8,836
SOCIAL INDEX
85.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
45th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
7,168
SOCIAL INDEX
69.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
129th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Immigrants from Ethiopia Integration in Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 118,974,642 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Ethiopia within Immigrant from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.180. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Czechoslovakia within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.073% in Immigrants from Ethiopia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Czechoslovakia corresponds to an increase of 73.5 Immigrants from Ethiopia.
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Immigrants from Ethiopia Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Immigrants from Ethiopia communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (27.3% compared to 21.6%, a difference of 26.5%), per capita income ($51,770 compared to $45,923, a difference of 12.7%), and median male earnings ($62,217 compared to $55,434, a difference of 12.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($66,376 compared to $65,238, a difference of 1.8%), householder income under 25 years ($54,352 compared to $53,408, a difference of 1.8%), and median female earnings ($43,571 compared to $42,744, a difference of 1.9%).
| Income Metric | Immigrants from Czechoslovakia | Immigrants from Ethiopia |
| Per Capita Income | Exceptional $51,770 | Exceptional $45,923 |
| Median Family Income | Exceptional $116,165 | Excellent $106,969 |
| Median Household Income | Exceptional $95,319 | Exceptional $88,687 |
| Median Earnings | Exceptional $52,361 | Exceptional $48,924 |
| Median Male Earnings | Exceptional $62,217 | Good $55,434 |
| Median Female Earnings | Exceptional $43,571 | Exceptional $42,744 |
| Householder Age | Under 25 years | Exceptional $54,352 | Exceptional $53,408 |
| Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Exceptional $106,888 | Average $95,256 |
| Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Exceptional $111,914 | Good $102,763 |
| Householder Age | Over 65 years | Exceptional $66,376 | Exceptional $65,238 |
| Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 27.3% | Exceptional 21.6% |
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Immigrants from Ethiopia Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Immigrants from Ethiopia communities in the United States are seen in single father poverty (16.2% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 20.5%), child poverty under the age of 16 (13.9% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 17.6%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (14.2% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 17.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.7% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 1.1%), single mother poverty (27.4% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 1.4%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.1% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 4.0%).
| Poverty Metric | Immigrants from Czechoslovakia | Immigrants from Ethiopia |
| Poverty | Exceptional 11.0% | Average 12.2% |
| Families | Exceptional 7.7% | Good 8.9% |
| Males | Exceptional 10.0% | Average 11.2% |
| Females | Exceptional 11.9% | Good 13.3% |
| Females 18 to 24 years | Exceptional 19.1% | Fair 20.2% |
| Females 25 to 34 years | Exceptional 12.1% | Exceptional 12.6% |
| Children Under 5 years | Exceptional 14.8% | Excellent 16.6% |
| Children Under 16 years | Exceptional 13.9% | Average 16.4% |
| Boys Under 16 years | Exceptional 14.4% | Average 16.4% |
| Girls Under 16 years | Exceptional 14.2% | Average 16.6% |
| Single Males | Exceptional 12.1% | Exceptional 11.4% |
| Single Females | Exceptional 19.0% | Exceptional 20.0% |
| Single Fathers | Good 16.2% | Exceptional 13.4% |
| Single Mothers | Exceptional 27.4% | Exceptional 27.7% |
| Married Couples | Exceptional 4.6% | Good 5.1% |
| Seniors Over 65 years | Exceptional 10.0% | Good 10.7% |
| Seniors Over 75 years | Excellent 11.7% | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Receiving Food Stamps | Exceptional 9.6% | Exceptional 10.7% |
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Immigrants from Ethiopia Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Immigrants from Ethiopia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.6% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 10.7%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.8% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 8.4%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.3% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 7.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male unemployment (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.040%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.8% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 0.14%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.5% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 0.74%).
| Unemployment Metric | Immigrants from Czechoslovakia | Immigrants from Ethiopia |
| Unemployment | Exceptional 5.0% | Excellent 5.1% |
| Males | Exceptional 5.1% | Exceptional 5.1% |
| Females | Exceptional 5.0% | Excellent 5.1% |
| Youth < 25 | Good 11.5% | Excellent 11.3% |
| Age | 16 to 19 years | Fair 17.8% | Fair 17.8% |
| Age | 20 to 24 years | Average 10.3% | Exceptional 9.6% |
| Age | 25 to 29 years | Good 6.6% | Exceptional 6.0% |
| Age | 30 to 34 years | Excellent 5.3% | Exceptional 5.0% |
| Age | 35 to 44 years | Excellent 4.5% | Excellent 4.5% |
| Age | 45 to 54 years | Excellent 4.4% | Exceptional 4.4% |
| Age | 55 to 59 years | Fair 4.8% | Exceptional 4.5% |
| Age | 60 to 64 years | Fair 4.9% | Excellent 4.8% |
| Age | 65 to 74 years | Good 5.3% | Exceptional 5.1% |
| Seniors > 65 | Good 5.1% | Exceptional 5.0% |
| Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 8.4% | Fair 8.8% |
| Women w/ Children < 6 | Exceptional 7.0% | Exceptional 6.9% |
| Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Fair 9.0% | Excellent 8.8% |
| Women w/ Children < 18 | Excellent 5.2% | Excellent 5.3% |
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Immigrants from Ethiopia Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Immigrants from Ethiopia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (64.8% compared to 69.4%, a difference of 7.2%), in labor force | age 16-19 (36.6% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 5.5%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (75.0% compared to 77.5%, a difference of 3.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (85.4% compared to 86.1%, a difference of 0.83%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.8% compared to 85.9%, a difference of 1.3%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.4% compared to 86.6%, a difference of 1.4%).
| Labor Participation Metric | Immigrants from Czechoslovakia | Immigrants from Ethiopia |
| In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Poor 64.8% | Exceptional 69.4% |
| In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Excellent 79.9% | Exceptional 82.1% |
| In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Average 36.6% | Exceptional 38.6% |
| In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Average 75.0% | Exceptional 77.5% |
| In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Exceptional 85.4% | Exceptional 86.1% |
| In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Exceptional 85.4% | Exceptional 86.6% |
| In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Exceptional 84.8% | Exceptional 85.9% |
| In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Exceptional 83.4% | Exceptional 84.8% |
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Immigrants from Ethiopia Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Immigrants from Ethiopia communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.3% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 24.3%), single father households (2.0% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 18.9%), and married-couple households (47.8% compared to 43.1%, a difference of 11.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (11.7% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 3.3%), average family size (3.14 compared to 3.25, a difference of 3.4%), and family households (63.4% compared to 61.2%, a difference of 3.6%).
| Family Structure Metric | Immigrants from Czechoslovakia | Immigrants from Ethiopia |
| Family Households | Tragic 63.4% | Tragic 61.2% |
| Family Households with Children | Tragic 26.2% | Exceptional 27.8% |
| Married-couple Households | Exceptional 47.8% | Tragic 43.1% |
| Average Family Size | Tragic 3.14 | Excellent 3.25 |
| Single Father Households | Exceptional 2.0% | Poor 2.4% |
| Single Mother Households | Exceptional 5.3% | Poor 6.6% |
| Currently Married | Exceptional 48.4% | Tragic 44.5% |
| Divorced or Separated | Exceptional 11.7% | Average 12.1% |
| Births to Unmarried Women | Exceptional 28.4% | Exceptional 29.7% |
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Immigrants from Ethiopia Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Immigrants from Ethiopia communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.8% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 13.0%), 3 or more vehicles in household (18.5% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 3.3%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (54.1% compared to 53.0%, a difference of 2.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (5.8% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 0.75%), 1 or more vehicles in household (88.3% compared to 89.6%, a difference of 1.4%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (54.1% compared to 53.0%, a difference of 2.0%).
| Vehicle Availability Metric | Immigrants from Czechoslovakia | Immigrants from Ethiopia |
| No Vehicles Available | Tragic 11.8% | Average 10.4% |
| 1+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 88.3% | Average 89.6% |
| 2+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 54.1% | Tragic 53.0% |
| 3+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 18.5% | Tragic 17.9% |
| 4+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 5.8% | Tragic 5.7% |
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Immigrants from Ethiopia Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Immigrants from Ethiopia communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.8% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 34.8%), professional degree (5.8% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 9.0%), and bachelor's degree (44.0% compared to 42.5%, a difference of 3.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of doctorate degree (2.4% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 0.44%), nursery school (98.2% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.68%), and kindergarten (98.2% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.68%).
| Education Level Metric | Immigrants from Czechoslovakia | Immigrants from Ethiopia |
| No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.8% | Tragic 2.5% |
| Nursery School | Exceptional 98.2% | Tragic 97.6% |
| Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.2% | Tragic 97.5% |
| 1st Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Tragic 97.5% |
| 2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Tragic 97.4% |
| 3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.0% | Tragic 97.3% |
| 4th Grade | Exceptional 97.9% | Tragic 97.0% |
| 5th Grade | Exceptional 97.7% | Tragic 96.8% |
| 6th Grade | Exceptional 97.4% | Tragic 96.5% |
| 7th Grade | Exceptional 96.6% | Tragic 95.3% |
| 8th Grade | Exceptional 96.4% | Tragic 95.0% |
| 9th Grade | Exceptional 95.7% | Tragic 94.3% |
| 10th Grade | Exceptional 94.7% | Tragic 93.1% |
| 11th Grade | Exceptional 93.8% | Poor 92.1% |
| 12th Grade, No Diploma | Exceptional 92.7% | Fair 90.9% |
| High School Diploma | Exceptional 90.9% | Fair 88.9% |
| GED/Equivalency | Exceptional 87.9% | Good 86.0% |
| College, Under 1 year | Exceptional 69.6% | Exceptional 68.0% |
| College, 1 year or more | Exceptional 64.1% | Exceptional 62.6% |
| Associate's Degree | Exceptional 51.9% | Exceptional 50.1% |
| Bachelor's Degree | Exceptional 44.0% | Exceptional 42.5% |
| Master's Degree | Exceptional 18.5% | Exceptional 17.9% |
| Professional Degree | Exceptional 5.8% | Exceptional 5.3% |
| Doctorate Degree | Exceptional 2.4% | Exceptional 2.4% |
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Immigrants from Ethiopia Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Immigrants from Ethiopia communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.1% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 16.4%), cognitive disability (16.2% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 10.4%), and ambulatory disability (5.8% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 8.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 18 to 34 (6.3% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 1.5%), vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 2.4%), and female disability (11.6% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 3.5%).
| Disability Metric | Immigrants from Czechoslovakia | Immigrants from Ethiopia |
| Disability | Exceptional 11.2% | Exceptional 10.7% |
| Males | Excellent 10.9% | Exceptional 10.2% |
| Females | Exceptional 11.6% | Exceptional 11.2% |
| Age | Under 5 years | Excellent 1.2% | Exceptional 1.1% |
| Age | 5 to 17 years | Exceptional 5.2% | Exceptional 5.4% |
| Age | 18 to 34 years | Exceptional 6.3% | Exceptional 6.2% |
| Age | 35 to 64 years | Exceptional 10.0% | Exceptional 10.5% |
| Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 21.0% | Excellent 22.7% |
| Age | Over 75 years | Exceptional 45.1% | Excellent 46.8% |
| Vision | Exceptional 2.0% | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Hearing | Poor 3.1% | Exceptional 2.7% |
| Cognitive | Exceptional 16.2% | Tragic 17.9% |
| Ambulatory | Exceptional 5.8% | Exceptional 5.4% |
| Self-Care | Exceptional 2.4% | Exceptional 2.2% |