Pima vs Immigrants from Ethiopia Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 49,605,296 people shows a perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Ethiopia within Pima communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.962. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Pima within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.124% in Immigrants from Ethiopia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Pima corresponds to an increase of 123.9 Immigrants from Ethiopia.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Ethiopia communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($30,644 compared to $45,923, a difference of 49.9%), median household income ($63,262 compared to $88,687, a difference of 40.2%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($73,365 compared to $102,763, a difference of 40.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (21.1% compared to 21.6%, a difference of 2.1%), householder income under 25 years ($51,503 compared to $53,408, a difference of 3.7%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($82,821 compared to $95,256, a difference of 15.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Ethiopia communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (11.4% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 124.9%), family poverty (18.4% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 107.4%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (23.9% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 106.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (14.8% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 9.9%), single mother poverty (38.6% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 39.2%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (28.4% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 40.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Ethiopia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (11.8% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 158.6%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (11.7% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 120.4%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (18.9% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 115.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 0.030%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.2% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 4.6%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (6.3% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 26.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Ethiopia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (57.4% compared to 69.4%, a difference of 20.9%), in labor force | age 20-64 (69.0% compared to 82.1%, a difference of 18.8%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (72.8% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 16.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (79.0% compared to 86.6%, a difference of 9.5%), in labor force | age 20-24 (69.0% compared to 77.5%, a difference of 12.3%), and in labor force | age 16-19 (34.1% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 13.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Ethiopia communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (51.5% compared to 29.7%, a difference of 73.4%), single father households (4.2% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 72.7%), and single mother households (8.3% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 25.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.1% compared to 27.8%, a difference of 2.5%), divorced or separated (12.9% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 6.6%), and family households (65.9% compared to 61.2%, a difference of 7.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Ethiopia communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 37.1%), no vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 35.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.0% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 23.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (52.0% compared to 53.0%, a difference of 2.0%), 1 or more vehicles in household (86.3% compared to 89.6%, a difference of 3.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.0% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 23.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Ethiopia communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (9.2% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 93.8%), bachelor's degree (23.2% compared to 42.5%, a difference of 83.0%), and doctorate degree (1.3% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 78.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 9th grade (93.9% compared to 94.3%, a difference of 0.34%), 8th grade (95.6% compared to 95.0%, a difference of 0.60%), and nursery school (98.2% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.69%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Ethiopia communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (38.6% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 69.8%), vision disability (3.3% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 69.1%), and disability age 35 to 64 (16.1% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 54.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 4.2%), cognitive disability (18.8% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 5.0%), and disability age 5 to 17 (6.2% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 14.6%).