Immigrants from Grenada vs Immigrants from Ethiopia Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 49,205,148 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Ethiopia within Immigrant from Grenada communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.358. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Grenada within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.078% in Immigrants from Ethiopia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Grenada corresponds to a decrease of 78.0 Immigrants from Ethiopia.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Grenada and Immigrants from Ethiopia communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (16.2% compared to 21.6%, a difference of 33.4%), householder income over 65 years ($50,747 compared to $65,238, a difference of 28.6%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($85,552 compared to $102,763, a difference of 20.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($41,932 compared to $42,744, a difference of 1.9%), householder income under 25 years ($54,538 compared to $53,408, a difference of 2.1%), and median earnings ($45,596 compared to $48,924, a difference of 7.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Grenada and Immigrants from Ethiopia communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (17.8% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 66.1%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (17.8% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 53.9%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (15.8% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 47.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (21.2% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 4.7%), single female poverty (21.8% compared to 20.0%, a difference of 8.9%), and single mother poverty (30.3% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 9.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Grenada and Immigrants from Ethiopia communities in the United States are seen in male unemployment (7.6% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 47.7%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (25.7% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 44.8%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (13.8% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 43.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.6% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 1.2%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.4% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 8.6%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.6% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 10.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Grenada and Immigrants from Ethiopia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (25.4% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 51.9%), in labor force | age 20-24 (67.2% compared to 77.5%, a difference of 15.4%), and in labor force | age > 16 (63.6% compared to 69.4%, a difference of 9.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (83.3% compared to 85.9%, a difference of 3.1%), in labor force | age 30-34 (83.5% compared to 86.6%, a difference of 3.7%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (82.8% compared to 86.1%, a difference of 4.0%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Grenada and Immigrants from Ethiopia communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (8.2% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 23.3%), births to unmarried women (36.3% compared to 29.7%, a difference of 22.3%), and single father households (2.0% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 20.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (11.9% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 1.4%), family households (62.6% compared to 61.2%, a difference of 2.4%), and average family size (3.34 compared to 3.25, a difference of 2.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Grenada and Immigrants from Ethiopia communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (37.5% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 259.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (2.7% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 109.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (9.1% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 96.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (62.7% compared to 89.6%, a difference of 42.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (28.7% compared to 53.0%, a difference of 85.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (9.1% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 96.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Grenada and Immigrants from Ethiopia communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 71.7%), professional degree (3.7% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 42.8%), and master's degree (14.0% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 28.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.3% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.32%), 3rd grade (97.0% compared to 97.3%, a difference of 0.32%), and 4th grade (96.7% compared to 97.0%, a difference of 0.32%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Grenada and Immigrants from Ethiopia communities in the United States are seen in ambulatory disability (6.9% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 29.5%), self-care disability (2.8% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 28.2%), and hearing disability (2.2% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 22.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.9% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 0.020%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.3% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 2.1%), and disability age over 75 (47.9% compared to 46.8%, a difference of 2.5%).