Immigrants from Ghana vs Immigrants from Ethiopia Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 133,087,884 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Ethiopia within Immigrant from Ghana communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.368. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Ghana within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.227% in Immigrants from Ethiopia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Ghana corresponds to an increase of 226.5 Immigrants from Ethiopia.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ghana and Immigrants from Ethiopia communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($41,131 compared to $45,923, a difference of 11.7%), householder income over 65 years ($58,624 compared to $65,238, a difference of 11.3%), and median family income ($96,544 compared to $106,969, a difference of 10.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (22.3% compared to 21.6%, a difference of 3.5%), householder income under 25 years ($51,333 compared to $53,408, a difference of 4.0%), and median male earnings ($51,836 compared to $55,434, a difference of 6.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ghana and Immigrants from Ethiopia communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (14.1% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 31.9%), single father poverty (16.7% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 24.5%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (14.4% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 23.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.5% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 1.5%), single mother poverty (29.9% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 7.8%), and single female poverty (21.9% compared to 20.0%, a difference of 9.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ghana and Immigrants from Ethiopia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.5% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 25.5%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (11.9% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 24.2%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.1% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 22.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.2% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 4.7%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.1% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 6.6%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.4% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 8.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ghana and Immigrants from Ethiopia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.4% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 8.9%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 77.5%, a difference of 4.0%), and in labor force | age > 16 (67.1% compared to 69.4%, a difference of 3.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 85.9%, a difference of 1.5%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.2% compared to 86.6%, a difference of 1.6%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.7% compared to 86.1%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ghana and Immigrants from Ethiopia communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (8.0% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 20.7%), births to unmarried women (34.5% compared to 29.7%, a difference of 16.2%), and currently married (42.7% compared to 44.5%, a difference of 4.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father households (2.4% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 0.77%), divorced or separated (12.2% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 1.0%), and average family size (3.29 compared to 3.25, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ghana and Immigrants from Ethiopia communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (16.6% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 59.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (47.4% compared to 53.0%, a difference of 11.9%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (5.2% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 10.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (83.4% compared to 89.6%, a difference of 7.4%), 3 or more vehicles in household (16.2% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 10.7%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (5.2% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 10.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ghana and Immigrants from Ethiopia communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 33.4%), professional degree (4.1% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 31.4%), and master's degree (15.0% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 19.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4th grade (96.9% compared to 97.0%, a difference of 0.14%), nursery school (97.4% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.15%), and 1st grade (97.4% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.15%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ghana and Immigrants from Ethiopia communities in the United States are seen in ambulatory disability (6.1% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 14.8%), self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 14.8%), and vision disability (2.2% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 14.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (47.7% compared to 46.8%, a difference of 2.0%), cognitive disability (18.3% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 2.2%), and hearing disability (2.6% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 4.0%).