Immigrants from Sweden vs Immigrants from Ethiopia Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 106,020,181 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Ethiopia within Immigrant from Sweden communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.879. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Sweden within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.190% in Immigrants from Ethiopia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Sweden corresponds to an increase of 189.6 Immigrants from Ethiopia.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Sweden and Immigrants from Ethiopia communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (28.1% compared to 21.6%, a difference of 30.2%), per capita income ($55,582 compared to $45,923, a difference of 21.0%), and median male earnings ($65,406 compared to $55,434, a difference of 18.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($53,621 compared to $53,408, a difference of 0.40%), median female earnings ($44,774 compared to $42,744, a difference of 4.8%), and householder income over 65 years ($69,722 compared to $65,238, a difference of 6.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Sweden and Immigrants from Ethiopia communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.4% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 16.0%), child poverty under the age of 16 (14.2% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 15.5%), and receiving food stamps (9.3% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 15.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 0.27%), single mother poverty (27.5% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 0.90%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.7% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Sweden and Immigrants from Ethiopia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.6% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 16.2%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.1% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 8.6%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.3% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 7.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.4% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 0.75%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.6% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 1.1%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.0% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Sweden and Immigrants from Ethiopia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.9% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 7.4%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.2% compared to 69.4%, a difference of 6.5%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (74.2% compared to 77.5%, a difference of 4.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (85.4% compared to 86.1%, a difference of 0.88%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.6% compared to 86.6%, a difference of 1.1%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.8% compared to 85.9%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Sweden and Immigrants from Ethiopia communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.4% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 23.4%), single father households (2.1% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 16.4%), and married-couple households (47.2% compared to 43.1%, a difference of 9.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (62.5% compared to 61.2%, a difference of 2.1%), average family size (3.14 compared to 3.25, a difference of 3.6%), and births to unmarried women (28.5% compared to 29.7%, a difference of 4.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Sweden and Immigrants from Ethiopia communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.2% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 7.5%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.2% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 7.1%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (55.2% compared to 53.0%, a difference of 4.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.3% compared to 89.6%, a difference of 0.34%), no vehicles in household (10.8% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 3.8%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (55.2% compared to 53.0%, a difference of 4.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Sweden and Immigrants from Ethiopia communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 41.0%), professional degree (6.7% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 25.4%), and doctorate degree (2.9% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 21.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.3% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.78%), kindergarten (98.3% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.78%), and 1st grade (98.3% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.79%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Sweden and Immigrants from Ethiopia communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.0% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 12.8%), disability age 65 to 74 (21.0% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 8.4%), and cognitive disability (16.7% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 7.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 0.15%), female disability (11.3% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 0.62%), and disability (11.0% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 2.5%).