Hawaiian vs Immigrants from Eastern Europe Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 302,519,192 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Eastern Europe within Hawaiian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.395. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Hawaiians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.011% in Immigrants from Eastern Europe. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Hawaiians corresponds to a decrease of 10.5 Immigrants from Eastern Europe.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Hawaiian and Immigrants from Eastern Europe communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($39,403 compared to $49,316, a difference of 25.2%), median male earnings ($50,488 compared to $60,958, a difference of 20.7%), and median earnings ($43,673 compared to $51,624, a difference of 18.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($64,920 compared to $62,693, a difference of 3.5%), householder income under 25 years ($53,078 compared to $55,572, a difference of 4.7%), and wage/income gap (24.9% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 6.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Hawaiian and Immigrants from Eastern Europe communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (12.9% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 19.1%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (14.1% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 17.3%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (17.4% compared to 15.1%, a difference of 14.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (18.7% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 2.6%), single father poverty (15.1% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 5.1%), and married-couple family poverty (5.1% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 5.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Hawaiian and Immigrants from Eastern Europe communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.3% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 15.9%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.2% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 15.4%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.9% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 10.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.4% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 0.35%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.9% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 0.50%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.5% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Hawaiian and Immigrants from Eastern Europe communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.4% compared to 35.8%, a difference of 7.4%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.0% compared to 74.9%, a difference of 2.9%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (83.0% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 2.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (64.7% compared to 65.4%, a difference of 1.0%), in labor force | age 20-64 (78.7% compared to 80.2%, a difference of 1.9%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (83.2% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Hawaiian and Immigrants from Eastern Europe communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.7% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 33.5%), births to unmarried women (33.2% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 20.5%), and single mother households (6.6% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 17.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (47.8% compared to 47.4%, a difference of 0.88%), currently married (46.6% compared to 48.0%, a difference of 3.0%), and divorced or separated (12.1% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 5.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Hawaiian and Immigrants from Eastern Europe communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.0% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 69.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (8.9% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 64.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (24.3% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 39.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.0% compared to 86.7%, a difference of 6.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.4% compared to 51.7%, a difference of 16.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (24.3% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 39.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Hawaiian and Immigrants from Eastern Europe communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.4% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 52.2%), master's degree (11.6% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 51.7%), and doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 44.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.9% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.10%), kindergarten (97.9% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.10%), and 1st grade (97.9% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.10%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Hawaiian and Immigrants from Eastern Europe communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (12.3% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 22.5%), disability age 65 to 74 (25.5% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 17.2%), and hearing disability (3.5% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 16.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 2.7%), self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 4.6%), and disability age over 75 (49.2% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 6.1%).