Bahamian vs Immigrants from Eastern Europe Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 108,519,511 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Eastern Europe within Bahamian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.138. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Bahamians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.063% in Immigrants from Eastern Europe. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Bahamians corresponds to a decrease of 62.8 Immigrants from Eastern Europe.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Bahamian and Immigrants from Eastern Europe communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($75,395 compared to $104,662, a difference of 38.8%), median male earnings ($44,756 compared to $60,958, a difference of 36.2%), and median family income ($82,631 compared to $112,527, a difference of 36.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($45,743 compared to $55,572, a difference of 21.5%), householder income over 65 years ($51,000 compared to $62,693, a difference of 22.9%), and median female earnings ($35,125 compared to $43,309, a difference of 23.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Bahamian and Immigrants from Eastern Europe communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (17.0% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 56.8%), child poverty under the age of 5 (23.0% compared to 15.1%, a difference of 51.8%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (21.5% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 48.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (18.0% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 13.4%), single mother poverty (31.3% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 15.0%), and single female poverty (22.7% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 19.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Bahamian and Immigrants from Eastern Europe communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.7% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 23.6%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.6% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 23.1%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (10.4% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 22.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 0.71%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.3% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 3.7%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.7% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 6.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Bahamian and Immigrants from Eastern Europe communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.6% compared to 35.8%, a difference of 3.3%), in labor force | age 20-64 (78.4% compared to 80.2%, a difference of 2.3%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (73.3% compared to 74.9%, a difference of 2.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 0.23%), in labor force | age 45-54 (82.2% compared to 83.3%, a difference of 1.4%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (83.7% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Bahamian and Immigrants from Eastern Europe communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (40.8% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 47.9%), single mother households (8.3% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 47.5%), and single father households (2.5% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 25.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.3% compared to 64.0%, a difference of 0.99%), family households with children (26.5% compared to 26.9%, a difference of 1.5%), and average family size (3.28 compared to 3.17, a difference of 3.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Bahamian and Immigrants from Eastern Europe communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.9% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 37.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.1% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 7.0%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (90.2% compared to 86.7%, a difference of 4.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (51.5% compared to 51.7%, a difference of 0.37%), 3 or more vehicles in household (16.9% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 2.7%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (90.2% compared to 86.7%, a difference of 4.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Bahamian and Immigrants from Eastern Europe communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 44.2%), professional degree (3.7% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 42.4%), and master's degree (12.4% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 41.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.8% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.22%), 1st grade (97.7% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.22%), and kindergarten (97.8% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.23%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Bahamian and Immigrants from Eastern Europe communities in the United States are seen in disability age 5 to 17 (6.3% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 23.0%), vision disability (2.4% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 20.3%), and disability age 35 to 64 (11.8% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 16.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 3.5%), disability age over 75 (48.0% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 3.6%), and hearing disability (2.9% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 4.3%).