Argentinean vs Immigrants from Eastern Europe Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 286,469,614 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Eastern Europe within Argentinean communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.021. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Argentineans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.009% in Immigrants from Eastern Europe. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Argentineans corresponds to an increase of 8.6 Immigrants from Eastern Europe.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Argentinean and Immigrants from Eastern Europe communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($65,246 compared to $62,693, a difference of 4.1%), median female earnings ($41,952 compared to $43,309, a difference of 3.2%), and householder income under 25 years ($54,154 compared to $55,572, a difference of 2.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median family income ($112,665 compared to $112,527, a difference of 0.12%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($110,103 compared to $109,335, a difference of 0.70%), and median household income ($93,960 compared to $93,051, a difference of 0.98%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Argentinean and Immigrants from Eastern Europe communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.7% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 7.6%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.4% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 6.6%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.5% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 4.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty among girls under 16 (14.7% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 0.16%), single mother poverty (27.2% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 0.16%), and receiving food stamps (10.8% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 0.19%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Argentinean and Immigrants from Eastern Europe communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.9% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 11.1%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.7% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 5.1%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.6% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 5.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female unemployment (5.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.23%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.70%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (18.0% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 0.76%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Argentinean and Immigrants from Eastern Europe communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (33.3% compared to 35.8%, a difference of 7.4%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.1% compared to 74.9%, a difference of 2.5%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.7% compared to 65.4%, a difference of 0.58%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (83.3% compared to 83.3%, a difference of 0.030%), in labor force | age 20-64 (80.0% compared to 80.2%, a difference of 0.24%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.1% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 0.32%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Argentinean and Immigrants from Eastern Europe communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (30.0% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 8.8%), single father households (2.1% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 7.7%), and single mother households (5.8% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 4.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (47.5% compared to 47.4%, a difference of 0.26%), family households (65.0% compared to 64.0%, a difference of 1.6%), and average family size (3.23 compared to 3.17, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Argentinean and Immigrants from Eastern Europe communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.2% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 21.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.2% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 13.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.9% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 8.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.9% compared to 86.7%, a difference of 2.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.5% compared to 51.7%, a difference of 5.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.9% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 8.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Argentinean and Immigrants from Eastern Europe communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.9% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 13.1%), doctorate degree (2.3% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 8.2%), and master's degree (18.2% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 3.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.0% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.040%), kindergarten (97.9% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.040%), and 1st grade (97.9% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.040%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Argentinean and Immigrants from Eastern Europe communities in the United States are seen in ambulatory disability (5.5% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 8.8%), hearing disability (2.7% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 8.6%), and self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 8.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 0.31%), disability age over 75 (46.2% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 0.34%), and cognitive disability (16.6% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 0.87%).