Norwegian vs Immigrants from Eastern Europe Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 459,715,192 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Eastern Europe within Norwegian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.438. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Norwegians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.009% in Immigrants from Eastern Europe. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Norwegians corresponds to a decrease of 8.5 Immigrants from Eastern Europe.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Norwegian and Immigrants from Eastern Europe communities in the United States are seen in median female earnings ($38,802 compared to $43,309, a difference of 11.6%), per capita income ($44,480 compared to $49,316, a difference of 10.9%), and median earnings ($46,865 compared to $51,624, a difference of 10.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($61,104 compared to $62,693, a difference of 2.6%), householder income under 25 years ($53,127 compared to $55,572, a difference of 4.6%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($103,682 compared to $109,335, a difference of 5.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Norwegian and Immigrants from Eastern Europe communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (3.7% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 31.3%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (8.7% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 25.3%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.2% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 23.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.9% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 0.34%), child poverty under the age of 5 (14.6% compared to 15.1%, a difference of 3.6%), and single mother poverty (28.4% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 4.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Norwegian and Immigrants from Eastern Europe communities in the United States are seen in female unemployment (4.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 23.4%), unemployment (4.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 23.2%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (14.5% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 22.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.2% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 2.1%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.3% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 2.3%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.0% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 6.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Norwegian and Immigrants from Eastern Europe communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (46.2% compared to 35.8%, a difference of 29.2%), in labor force | age 20-24 (80.1% compared to 74.9%, a difference of 7.1%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (84.4% compared to 83.3%, a difference of 1.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.7% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 0.38%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.7% compared to 65.4%, a difference of 0.48%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (85.6% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 0.81%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Norwegian and Immigrants from Eastern Europe communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.4% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 20.8%), births to unmarried women (29.3% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 6.4%), and divorced or separated (12.1% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 5.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.9% compared to 64.0%, a difference of 0.11%), family households with children (27.4% compared to 26.9%, a difference of 1.8%), and single mother households (5.5% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 2.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Norwegian and Immigrants from Eastern Europe communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 111.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (8.0% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 47.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.9% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 37.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (93.7% compared to 86.7%, a difference of 8.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (62.8% compared to 51.7%, a difference of 21.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.9% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 37.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Norwegian and Immigrants from Eastern Europe communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.3% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 50.6%), master's degree (14.0% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 25.2%), and professional degree (4.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 25.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of college, under 1 year (68.4% compared to 67.9%, a difference of 0.72%), nursery school (98.7% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.75%), and kindergarten (98.7% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.76%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Norwegian and Immigrants from Eastern Europe communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.7% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 41.4%), hearing disability (3.7% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 24.1%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.6% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 23.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.5% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 0.29%), vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 0.91%), and ambulatory disability (5.9% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 1.5%).