Canadian vs Immigrants from Eastern Europe Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 401,286,728 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Eastern Europe within Canadian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.608. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Canadians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.213% in Immigrants from Eastern Europe. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Canadians corresponds to an increase of 212.8 Immigrants from Eastern Europe.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Canadian and Immigrants from Eastern Europe communities in the United States are seen in median female earnings ($39,724 compared to $43,309, a difference of 9.0%), median earnings ($47,911 compared to $51,624, a difference of 7.7%), and per capita income ($45,858 compared to $49,316, a difference of 7.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($62,230 compared to $62,693, a difference of 0.74%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($104,560 compared to $109,335, a difference of 4.6%), and median family income ($106,597 compared to $112,527, a difference of 5.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Canadian and Immigrants from Eastern Europe communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (13.6% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 13.5%), single male poverty (13.3% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 12.5%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.3% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 11.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family poverty (8.2% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 1.1%), male poverty (10.5% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 2.8%), and poverty (11.6% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 2.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Canadian and Immigrants from Eastern Europe communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.4% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 11.1%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.8% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 10.6%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.7% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 9.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.6% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 0.12%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.15%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.3% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.19%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Canadian and Immigrants from Eastern Europe communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.1% compared to 35.8%, a difference of 12.1%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.6% compared to 74.9%, a difference of 2.3%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.1% compared to 65.4%, a difference of 1.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.7% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 0.56%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.2% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 0.88%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.4% compared to 83.3%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Canadian and Immigrants from Eastern Europe communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (31.9% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 15.8%), single father households (2.3% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 14.4%), and divorced or separated (12.4% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 7.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (48.3% compared to 48.0%, a difference of 0.68%), family households with children (27.1% compared to 26.9%, a difference of 0.75%), and family households (64.4% compared to 64.0%, a difference of 0.76%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Canadian and Immigrants from Eastern Europe communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.3% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 63.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.9% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 26.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.0% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 20.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.8% compared to 86.7%, a difference of 5.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.6% compared to 51.7%, a difference of 13.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.0% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 20.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Canadian and Immigrants from Eastern Europe communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 21.3%), professional degree (4.7% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 12.1%), and master's degree (15.7% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 12.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (87.1% compared to 87.1%, a difference of 0.010%), 12th grade, no diploma (92.4% compared to 92.1%, a difference of 0.32%), and nursery school (98.4% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.40%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Canadian and Immigrants from Eastern Europe communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.5% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 24.3%), disability age 18 to 34 (7.3% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 18.6%), and hearing disability (3.5% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 17.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.6% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 0.52%), self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 1.5%), and cognitive disability (16.8% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 2.3%).