Immigrants from Belgium vs Immigrants from Brazil Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 130,851,356 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Brazil within Immigrant from Belgium communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.370. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Belgium within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.119% in Immigrants from Brazil. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Belgium corresponds to an increase of 119.5 Immigrants from Brazil.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Belgium and Immigrants from Brazil communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($55,082 compared to $48,164, a difference of 14.4%), median male earnings ($66,125 compared to $58,324, a difference of 13.4%), and median family income ($123,831 compared to $109,418, a difference of 13.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($54,830 compared to $54,487, a difference of 0.63%), wage/income gap (29.0% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 7.5%), and median female earnings ($44,587 compared to $41,273, a difference of 8.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Belgium and Immigrants from Brazil communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.6% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 12.6%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.3% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 9.9%), and family poverty (7.8% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 8.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single female poverty (19.8% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 0.66%), single mother poverty (28.5% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 1.9%), and single father poverty (15.6% compared to 15.3%, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Belgium and Immigrants from Brazil communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.1% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 12.2%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.2% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 9.9%), and female unemployment (4.9% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 9.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.5% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 0.19%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.9% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 0.68%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.5% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 2.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Belgium and Immigrants from Brazil communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.3% compared to 37.1%, a difference of 5.1%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.9% compared to 66.7%, a difference of 2.8%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (73.9% compared to 75.5%, a difference of 2.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.3% compared to 85.5%, a difference of 0.22%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.6% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.54%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.1% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 0.93%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Belgium and Immigrants from Brazil communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.3% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 14.1%), single father households (2.0% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 9.6%), and births to unmarried women (28.0% compared to 29.6%, a difference of 5.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.15 compared to 3.18, a difference of 0.70%), family households (63.0% compared to 63.6%, a difference of 0.89%), and family households with children (26.7% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Belgium and Immigrants from Brazil communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.8% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 11.0%), no vehicles in household (11.8% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 9.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.4% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 7.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.4% compared to 89.6%, a difference of 1.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.3% compared to 52.8%, a difference of 2.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.4% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 7.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Belgium and Immigrants from Brazil communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.9% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 31.2%), professional degree (7.0% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 30.9%), and master's degree (20.8% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 19.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.3% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.37%), kindergarten (98.3% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.37%), and 1st grade (98.3% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.38%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Belgium and Immigrants from Brazil communities in the United States are seen in disability age 5 to 17 (5.2% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 12.3%), vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 11.2%), and disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 9.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male disability (10.8% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 0.24%), ambulatory disability (5.6% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 0.26%), and self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 0.36%).