Immigrants from Moldova vs Immigrants from Brazil Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 112,679,275 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Brazil within Immigrant from Moldova communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.162. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Moldova within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.039% in Immigrants from Brazil. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Moldova corresponds to a decrease of 38.9 Immigrants from Brazil.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Moldova and Immigrants from Brazil communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (26.2% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 3.1%), householder income under 25 years ($56,168 compared to $54,487, a difference of 3.1%), and median female earnings ($42,304 compared to $41,273, a difference of 2.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median family income ($109,975 compared to $109,418, a difference of 0.51%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($101,091 compared to $100,534, a difference of 0.55%), and median household income ($91,446 compared to $90,907, a difference of 0.59%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Moldova and Immigrants from Brazil communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (14.5% compared to 16.0%, a difference of 10.1%), family poverty (7.7% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 9.9%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (13.8% compared to 15.1%, a difference of 9.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.2% compared to 15.3%, a difference of 0.52%), receiving food stamps (10.9% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 0.72%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (17.9% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 3.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Moldova and Immigrants from Brazil communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.0% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 13.6%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.6% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 13.5%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.9% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 10.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male unemployment (5.1% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.59%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.1% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 0.62%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.5% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Moldova and Immigrants from Brazil communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.7% compared to 37.1%, a difference of 1.5%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.6% compared to 75.5%, a difference of 1.4%), and in labor force | age > 16 (66.1% compared to 66.7%, a difference of 0.80%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (85.0% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.020%), in labor force | age 20-64 (80.6% compared to 80.7%, a difference of 0.10%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.3% compared to 85.5%, a difference of 0.24%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Moldova and Immigrants from Brazil communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (27.3% compared to 29.6%, a difference of 8.7%), single mother households (5.6% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 7.7%), and currently married (48.5% compared to 46.6%, a difference of 4.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.18 compared to 3.18, a difference of 0.040%), divorced or separated (12.1% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 0.67%), and family households with children (27.6% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 0.94%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Moldova and Immigrants from Brazil communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.0% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 13.8%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.1% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 11.4%), and no vehicles in household (9.8% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 9.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.2% compared to 89.6%, a difference of 0.78%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.1% compared to 52.8%, a difference of 6.2%), and no vehicles in household (9.8% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 9.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Moldova and Immigrants from Brazil communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.0% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 12.9%), professional degree (4.9% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 9.0%), and master's degree (16.6% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 4.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.0% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.060%), kindergarten (98.0% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.060%), and 1st grade (98.0% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.070%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Moldova and Immigrants from Brazil communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 20.6%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.2% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 11.9%), and self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 11.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.7% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 1.9%), disability age over 75 (47.4% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 2.5%), and male disability (11.1% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 2.8%).