Pima vs Immigrants from Brazil Community Comparison

COMPARE

Pima
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Immigrants from Brazil
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHonduranHopiHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ik
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBurma/MyanmarCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMiddle AfricaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Pima

Immigrants from Brazil

Poor
Good
1,700
SOCIAL INDEX
14.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
291st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
7,381
SOCIAL INDEX
71.3/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
119th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Immigrants from Brazil Integration in Pima Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 55,653,740 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Brazil within Pima communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.024. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Pima within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.000% in Immigrants from Brazil. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Pima corresponds to a decrease of 0.3 Immigrants from Brazil.
Pima Integration in Immigrants from Brazil Communities

Pima vs Immigrants from Brazil Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Brazil communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($30,644 compared to $48,164, a difference of 57.2%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($73,365 compared to $106,470, a difference of 45.1%), and median household income ($63,262 compared to $90,907, a difference of 43.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,503 compared to $54,487, a difference of 5.8%), median female earnings ($35,326 compared to $41,273, a difference of 16.8%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($82,821 compared to $100,534, a difference of 21.4%).
Pima vs Immigrants from Brazil Income
Income MetricPimaImmigrants from Brazil
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$30,644
Exceptional
$48,164
Median Family Income
Tragic
$77,431
Exceptional
$109,418
Median Household Income
Tragic
$63,262
Exceptional
$90,907
Median Earnings
Tragic
$38,285
Exceptional
$49,463
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$42,357
Exceptional
$58,324
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$35,326
Exceptional
$41,273
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Poor
$51,503
Exceptional
$54,487
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$82,821
Exceptional
$100,534
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$73,365
Exceptional
$106,470
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$50,539
Excellent
$62,364
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
21.1%
Tragic
27.0%

Pima vs Immigrants from Brazil Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Brazil communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (11.4% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 130.0%), family poverty (18.4% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 117.0%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (25.3% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 97.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (14.8% compared to 15.3%, a difference of 3.5%), single mother poverty (38.6% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 38.2%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (28.4% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 53.4%).
Pima vs Immigrants from Brazil Poverty
Poverty MetricPimaImmigrants from Brazil
Poverty
Tragic
21.9%
Excellent
11.7%
Families
Tragic
18.4%
Excellent
8.5%
Males
Tragic
20.4%
Excellent
10.6%
Females
Tragic
23.6%
Excellent
12.8%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
28.4%
Exceptional
18.5%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
25.3%
Exceptional
12.8%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
27.4%
Exceptional
16.0%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
29.0%
Exceptional
15.1%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
29.7%
Exceptional
15.4%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
28.2%
Exceptional
15.1%
Single Males
Tragic
20.2%
Exceptional
11.7%
Single Females
Tragic
30.3%
Exceptional
19.7%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
14.8%
Exceptional
15.3%
Single Mothers
Tragic
38.6%
Exceptional
27.9%
Married Couples
Tragic
11.4%
Excellent
5.0%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
19.8%
Poor
11.3%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
23.9%
Tragic
12.9%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
19.0%
Exceptional
10.8%

Pima vs Immigrants from Brazil Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Brazil communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (11.8% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 154.0%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (18.9% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 110.7%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (11.7% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 105.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.2% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 2.8%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 3.4%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (6.3% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 15.4%).
Pima vs Immigrants from Brazil Unemployment
Unemployment MetricPimaImmigrants from Brazil
Unemployment
Tragic
8.2%
Good
5.2%
Males
Tragic
8.3%
Excellent
5.2%
Females
Tragic
9.3%
Poor
5.4%
Youth < 25
Tragic
16.2%
Good
11.5%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
23.1%
Exceptional
17.0%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
14.2%
Excellent
10.1%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
11.8%
Exceptional
6.4%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
9.6%
Excellent
5.3%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
11.8%
Good
4.6%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
6.4%
Average
4.5%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
6.6%
Tragic
4.9%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Excellent
4.8%
Poor
4.9%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
6.6%
Tragic
5.6%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
6.3%
Tragic
5.4%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
9.2%
Poor
9.0%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
13.4%
Good
7.5%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
18.9%
Average
9.0%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
11.7%
Tragic
5.7%

Pima vs Immigrants from Brazil Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Brazil communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 20-64 (69.0% compared to 80.7%, a difference of 16.8%), in labor force | age > 16 (57.4% compared to 66.7%, a difference of 16.1%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (72.8% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 15.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (79.0% compared to 85.5%, a difference of 8.1%), in labor force | age 16-19 (34.1% compared to 37.1%, a difference of 8.9%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (69.0% compared to 75.5%, a difference of 9.5%).
Pima vs Immigrants from Brazil Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricPimaImmigrants from Brazil
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
57.4%
Exceptional
66.7%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
69.0%
Exceptional
80.7%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
34.1%
Good
37.1%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
69.0%
Excellent
75.5%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
74.3%
Exceptional
85.5%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
79.0%
Exceptional
85.5%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
74.8%
Exceptional
85.0%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
72.8%
Exceptional
83.9%

Pima vs Immigrants from Brazil Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Brazil communities in the United States are seen in single father households (4.2% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 91.9%), births to unmarried women (51.5% compared to 29.6%, a difference of 73.6%), and single mother households (8.3% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 36.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.1% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 1.1%), family households (65.9% compared to 63.6%, a difference of 3.8%), and divorced or separated (12.9% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 7.6%).
Pima vs Immigrants from Brazil Family Structure
Family Structure MetricPimaImmigrants from Brazil
Family Households
Exceptional
65.9%
Tragic
63.6%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
27.1%
Average
27.4%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
35.6%
Fair
46.2%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.75
Tragic
3.18
Single Father Households
Tragic
4.2%
Exceptional
2.2%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
8.3%
Good
6.1%
Currently Married
Tragic
35.9%
Average
46.6%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
12.9%
Good
12.0%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
51.5%
Exceptional
29.6%

Pima vs Immigrants from Brazil Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Brazil communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 50.1%), no vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 31.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.0% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 28.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (52.0% compared to 52.8%, a difference of 1.5%), 1 or more vehicles in household (86.3% compared to 89.6%, a difference of 3.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.0% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 28.7%).
Pima vs Immigrants from Brazil Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricPimaImmigrants from Brazil
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
14.1%
Fair
10.8%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
86.3%
Average
89.6%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
52.0%
Tragic
52.8%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
22.0%
Tragic
17.1%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.9%
Tragic
5.2%

Pima vs Immigrants from Brazil Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Brazil communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (9.2% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 87.6%), bachelor's degree (23.2% compared to 42.2%, a difference of 81.9%), and doctorate degree (1.3% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 67.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 7th grade (96.1% compared to 96.0%, a difference of 0.11%), 8th grade (95.6% compared to 95.7%, a difference of 0.12%), and 4th grade (97.7% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.25%).
Pima vs Immigrants from Brazil Education Level
Education Level MetricPimaImmigrants from Brazil
No Schooling Completed
Average
2.1%
Good
2.1%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.2%
Average
98.0%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.2%
Average
98.0%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Average
97.9%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Average
97.9%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Average
97.7%
4th Grade
Exceptional
97.7%
Average
97.5%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.6%
Fair
97.3%
6th Grade
Excellent
97.2%
Fair
96.9%
7th Grade
Good
96.1%
Average
96.0%
8th Grade
Fair
95.6%
Average
95.7%
9th Grade
Tragic
93.9%
Good
95.0%
10th Grade
Tragic
91.2%
Good
94.0%
11th Grade
Tragic
88.3%
Excellent
92.9%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
84.6%
Good
91.5%
High School Diploma
Tragic
81.6%
Good
89.5%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
76.4%
Excellent
86.6%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
51.4%
Excellent
66.9%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
45.6%
Exceptional
61.6%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
30.2%
Exceptional
50.0%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
23.2%
Exceptional
42.2%
Master's Degree
Tragic
9.2%
Exceptional
17.4%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.3%
Exceptional
5.3%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.3%
Exceptional
2.2%

Pima vs Immigrants from Brazil Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Brazil communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (38.6% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 76.2%), disability age 35 to 64 (16.1% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 58.6%), and vision disability (3.3% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 49.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (6.2% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 5.8%), cognitive disability (18.8% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 10.4%), and male disability (12.8% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 19.3%).
Pima vs Immigrants from Brazil Disability
Disability MetricPimaImmigrants from Brazil
Disability
Tragic
13.7%
Exceptional
11.2%
Males
Tragic
12.8%
Exceptional
10.8%
Females
Tragic
14.8%
Exceptional
11.6%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
1.1%
Tragic
1.4%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.2%
Tragic
5.8%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.7%
Exceptional
6.3%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
16.1%
Exceptional
10.2%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
38.6%
Exceptional
21.9%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
55.8%
Exceptional
46.3%
Vision
Tragic
3.3%
Poor
2.2%
Hearing
Tragic
3.7%
Excellent
2.9%
Cognitive
Tragic
18.8%
Excellent
17.0%
Ambulatory
Tragic
8.2%
Exceptional
5.6%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.8%
Exceptional
2.3%