Immigrants from England vs Immigrants from Brazil Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 292,216,619 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Brazil within Immigrant from England communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.780. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from England within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.401% in Immigrants from Brazil. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from England corresponds to an increase of 400.9 Immigrants from Brazil.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from England and Immigrants from Brazil communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($65,715 compared to $62,364, a difference of 5.4%), householder income under 25 years ($51,817 compared to $54,487, a difference of 5.1%), and wage/income gap (27.9% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 3.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($41,277 compared to $41,273, a difference of 0.010%), median earnings ($49,722 compared to $49,463, a difference of 0.52%), and median household income ($92,098 compared to $90,907, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from England and Immigrants from Brazil communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.2% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 15.7%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.8% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 15.5%), and married-couple family poverty (4.5% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 10.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty among girls under 16 (15.1% compared to 15.1%, a difference of 0.14%), child poverty under the age of 5 (16.2% compared to 16.0%, a difference of 1.3%), and single mother poverty (28.4% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from England and Immigrants from Brazil communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 7.1%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.3% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 6.6%), and female unemployment (5.0% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 6.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.5% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 0.22%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.6% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 0.30%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.9% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 0.30%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from England and Immigrants from Brazil communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (64.2% compared to 66.7%, a difference of 3.9%), in labor force | age 16-19 (38.1% compared to 37.1%, a difference of 2.6%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.2% compared to 80.7%, a difference of 1.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.5% compared to 75.5%, a difference of 0.010%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.7% compared to 85.5%, a difference of 0.91%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.7% compared to 85.5%, a difference of 0.93%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from England and Immigrants from Brazil communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.8% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 5.2%), births to unmarried women (31.1% compared to 29.6%, a difference of 4.8%), and married-couple households (48.2% compared to 46.2%, a difference of 4.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father households (2.2% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 0.68%), average family size (3.15 compared to 3.18, a difference of 0.87%), and family households (64.4% compared to 63.6%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from England and Immigrants from Brazil communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.7% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 28.2%), no vehicles in household (8.7% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 24.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.7% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 20.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.4% compared to 89.6%, a difference of 2.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.1% compared to 52.8%, a difference of 10.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.7% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 20.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from England and Immigrants from Brazil communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 19.5%), college, under 1 year (68.7% compared to 66.9%, a difference of 2.8%), and college, 1 year or more (62.8% compared to 61.6%, a difference of 1.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of professional degree (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.010%), doctorate degree (2.2% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 0.13%), and nursery school (98.3% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.37%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from England and Immigrants from Brazil communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.3% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 16.3%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.9% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 10.7%), and ambulatory disability (6.1% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 9.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.0% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 0.78%), disability age under 5 (1.4% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 0.95%), and disability age 65 to 74 (22.2% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 1.4%).