Immigrants from Russia vs Immigrants from Brazil Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 273,611,301 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Brazil within Immigrant from Russia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.423. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Russia within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.117% in Immigrants from Brazil. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Russia corresponds to an increase of 116.8 Immigrants from Brazil.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Russia and Immigrants from Brazil communities in the United States are seen in median male earnings ($63,326 compared to $58,324, a difference of 8.6%), median female earnings ($44,680 compared to $41,273, a difference of 8.3%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($108,751 compared to $100,534, a difference of 8.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (26.4% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 2.4%), householder income under 25 years ($55,891 compared to $54,487, a difference of 2.6%), and householder income over 65 years ($64,512 compared to $62,364, a difference of 3.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Russia and Immigrants from Brazil communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (15.0% compared to 16.0%, a difference of 6.5%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.2% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 5.2%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.4% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 4.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male poverty (10.6% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 0.12%), receiving food stamps (10.8% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 0.30%), and poverty (11.7% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 0.39%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Russia and Immigrants from Brazil communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.7% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 12.5%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.2% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 8.6%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.3% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 7.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.16%), unemployment (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.24%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.5% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 0.39%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Russia and Immigrants from Brazil communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.1% compared to 37.1%, a difference of 8.9%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.5% compared to 75.5%, a difference of 2.8%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.3% compared to 66.7%, a difference of 2.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.3% compared to 85.5%, a difference of 0.15%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.8% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.31%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.9% compared to 85.5%, a difference of 0.77%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Russia and Immigrants from Brazil communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.0% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 11.2%), single mother households (5.5% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 10.6%), and births to unmarried women (27.1% compared to 29.6%, a difference of 9.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.16 compared to 3.18, a difference of 0.36%), family households (63.2% compared to 63.6%, a difference of 0.58%), and married-couple households (47.0% compared to 46.2%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Russia and Immigrants from Brazil communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (15.1% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 40.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (50.3% compared to 52.8%, a difference of 5.0%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (85.4% compared to 89.6%, a difference of 4.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (16.9% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 1.3%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.3% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 1.5%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (85.4% compared to 89.6%, a difference of 4.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Russia and Immigrants from Brazil communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.5% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 14.4%), professional degree (6.0% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 13.8%), and master's degree (19.4% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 11.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.0% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.030%), kindergarten (98.0% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.030%), and 1st grade (97.9% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.030%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Russia and Immigrants from Brazil communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 28.5%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.0% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 15.8%), and vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 11.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female disability (11.7% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 0.52%), disability (11.1% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 0.63%), and hearing disability (2.9% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 1.1%).