Immigrants from Laos vs Arab Community Comparison
COMPARE
Immigrants from Laos
Arab
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Immigrants from Laos
Arabs
2,709
SOCIAL INDEX
24.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
242nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
6,013
SOCIAL INDEX
57.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
166th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Arab Integration in Immigrants from Laos Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 194,390,961 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Arabs within Immigrant from Laos communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.222. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Laos within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.043% in Arabs. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Laos corresponds to a decrease of 42.5 Arabs.
Immigrants from Laos vs Arab Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Laos and Arab communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($37,857 compared to $45,662, a difference of 20.6%), median male earnings ($49,190 compared to $57,298, a difference of 16.5%), and median family income ($92,239 compared to $106,952, a difference of 16.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($50,041 compared to $51,219, a difference of 2.4%), householder income over 65 years ($56,722 compared to $62,266, a difference of 9.8%), and median female earnings ($36,841 compared to $40,718, a difference of 10.5%).
Income Metric | Immigrants from Laos | Arab |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $37,857 | Exceptional $45,662 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $92,239 | Excellent $106,952 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $78,327 | Excellent $88,398 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $42,884 | Exceptional $48,599 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $49,190 | Exceptional $57,298 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $36,841 | Excellent $40,718 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $50,041 | Tragic $51,219 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $85,553 | Excellent $97,336 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $90,909 | Excellent $104,566 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $56,722 | Good $62,266 |
Wage/Income Gap | Exceptional 23.8% | Poor 26.6% |
Immigrants from Laos vs Arab Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Laos and Arab communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (13.8% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 19.9%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (15.2% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 14.4%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (18.7% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 12.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (13.0% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 0.27%), married-couple family poverty (5.7% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 0.60%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.6% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 0.64%).
Poverty Metric | Immigrants from Laos | Arab |
Poverty | Tragic 13.8% | Fair 12.7% |
Families | Tragic 10.2% | Fair 9.2% |
Males | Tragic 12.6% | Poor 11.6% |
Females | Tragic 15.0% | Fair 13.7% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 20.6% | Poor 20.5% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 15.2% | Good 13.2% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 19.4% | Average 17.4% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 18.7% | Fair 16.6% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 18.7% | Fair 16.8% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 18.9% | Fair 16.8% |
Single Males | Fair 13.0% | Fair 13.0% |
Single Females | Tragic 22.9% | Good 20.7% |
Single Fathers | Exceptional 15.1% | Poor 16.6% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 30.6% | Good 29.0% |
Married Couples | Tragic 5.7% | Tragic 5.7% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Fair 11.1% | Good 10.8% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Good 12.0% | Average 12.2% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 13.8% | Good 11.5% |
Immigrants from Laos vs Arab Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Laos and Arab communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.2% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 14.2%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.9% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 7.0%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.9% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 6.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.30%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.1% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 0.50%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.5% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.54%).
Unemployment Metric | Immigrants from Laos | Arab |
Unemployment | Fair 5.3% | Fair 5.3% |
Males | Poor 5.4% | Fair 5.4% |
Females | Average 5.3% | Fair 5.3% |
Youth < 25 | Good 11.5% | Poor 11.8% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Excellent 17.1% | Excellent 17.2% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.9% | Tragic 10.6% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Good 6.6% | Excellent 6.5% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Average 5.5% | Average 5.4% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Fair 4.7% | Average 4.7% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Fair 4.6% | Poor 4.6% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Average 4.8% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.6% | Good 4.8% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Good 5.3% | Average 5.4% |
Seniors > 65 | Good 5.1% | Excellent 5.1% |
Seniors > 75 | Fair 8.9% | Tragic 9.5% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Average 7.6% | Tragic 7.9% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 8.2% | Tragic 9.3% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Fair 5.5% | Fair 5.6% |
Immigrants from Laos vs Arab Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Laos and Arab communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.6% compared to 36.8%, a difference of 10.3%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.4% compared to 74.6%, a difference of 3.7%), and in labor force | age > 16 (66.0% compared to 65.2%, a difference of 1.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (83.8% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 0.040%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.4% compared to 79.2%, a difference of 0.15%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.2% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 0.17%).
Labor Participation Metric | Immigrants from Laos | Arab |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Exceptional 66.0% | Good 65.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Fair 79.4% | Poor 79.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 40.6% | Good 36.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Exceptional 77.4% | Poor 74.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Good 84.8% | Tragic 84.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 84.2% | Tragic 84.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 83.8% | Tragic 83.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 81.6% | Poor 82.4% |
Immigrants from Laos vs Arab Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Laos and Arab communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.9% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 34.2%), single mother households (7.7% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 27.2%), and births to unmarried women (34.0% compared to 29.2%, a difference of 16.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.3% compared to 64.1%, a difference of 2.0%), average family size (3.34 compared to 3.23, a difference of 3.3%), and married-couple households (45.1% compared to 46.9%, a difference of 4.0%).
Family Structure Metric | Immigrants from Laos | Arab |
Family Households | Exceptional 65.3% | Fair 64.1% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 29.8% | Exceptional 28.0% |
Married-couple Households | Tragic 45.1% | Good 46.9% |
Average Family Size | Exceptional 3.34 | Average 3.23 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 2.9% | Exceptional 2.1% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 7.7% | Excellent 6.0% |
Currently Married | Tragic 45.0% | Good 47.0% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 12.4% | Exceptional 11.6% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 34.0% | Exceptional 29.2% |
Immigrants from Laos vs Arab Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Laos and Arab communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 28.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 27.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.4% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 18.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.8% compared to 89.6%, a difference of 2.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.2% compared to 55.0%, a difference of 7.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.4% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 18.2%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Immigrants from Laos | Arab |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 8.2% | Average 10.5% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 91.8% | Average 89.6% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 59.2% | Fair 55.0% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 22.4% | Poor 18.9% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.7% | Poor 6.0% |
Immigrants from Laos vs Arab Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Laos and Arab communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.2% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 55.5%), doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 52.2%), and no schooling completed (3.1% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 49.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (96.9% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 1.1%), kindergarten (96.9% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 1.1%), and 1st grade (96.8% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 1.1%).
Education Level Metric | Immigrants from Laos | Arab |
No Schooling Completed | Tragic 3.1% | Average 2.1% |
Nursery School | Tragic 96.9% | Fair 97.9% |
Kindergarten | Tragic 96.9% | Fair 97.9% |
1st Grade | Tragic 96.8% | Fair 97.9% |
2nd Grade | Tragic 96.7% | Fair 97.8% |
3rd Grade | Tragic 96.6% | Fair 97.7% |
4th Grade | Tragic 96.3% | Average 97.5% |
5th Grade | Tragic 96.0% | Average 97.3% |
6th Grade | Tragic 95.7% | Average 97.0% |
7th Grade | Tragic 94.5% | Good 96.2% |
8th Grade | Tragic 94.1% | Good 95.9% |
9th Grade | Tragic 93.2% | Good 95.1% |
10th Grade | Tragic 91.9% | Excellent 94.0% |
11th Grade | Tragic 90.5% | Excellent 92.9% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 88.9% | Excellent 91.6% |
High School Diploma | Tragic 86.6% | Excellent 89.7% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 82.7% | Excellent 86.6% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 61.3% | Exceptional 67.2% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 54.7% | Exceptional 61.6% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 40.7% | Exceptional 49.0% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 31.6% | Exceptional 40.9% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 11.4% | Exceptional 16.7% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.2% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.4% | Exceptional 2.1% |
Immigrants from Laos vs Arab Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Laos and Arab communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (13.0% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 18.9%), disability age 65 to 74 (26.1% compared to 22.8%, a difference of 14.8%), and vision disability (2.4% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 11.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 2.8%), cognitive disability (18.1% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 4.3%), and disability age over 75 (49.2% compared to 47.1%, a difference of 4.5%).
Disability Metric | Immigrants from Laos | Arab |
Disability | Tragic 12.4% | Excellent 11.4% |
Males | Tragic 11.9% | Excellent 11.0% |
Females | Tragic 12.8% | Exceptional 11.9% |
Age | Under 5 years | Fair 1.3% | Good 1.2% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 5.8% | Exceptional 5.4% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 7.2% | Good 6.5% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 13.0% | Excellent 10.9% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 26.1% | Excellent 22.8% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 49.2% | Good 47.1% |
Vision | Tragic 2.4% | Excellent 2.1% |
Hearing | Tragic 3.2% | Average 3.0% |
Cognitive | Tragic 18.1% | Average 17.3% |
Ambulatory | Poor 6.3% | Exceptional 5.9% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.7% | Good 2.4% |