Norwegian vs Arab Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 465,669,742 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Arabs within Norwegian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.090. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Norwegians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.002% in Arabs. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Norwegians corresponds to a decrease of 1.9 Arabs.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Norwegian and Arab communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (29.0% compared to 26.6%, a difference of 8.9%), median female earnings ($38,802 compared to $40,718, a difference of 4.9%), and householder income under 25 years ($53,127 compared to $51,219, a difference of 3.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($96,866 compared to $97,336, a difference of 0.49%), median family income ($106,144 compared to $106,952, a difference of 0.76%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($103,682 compared to $104,566, a difference of 0.85%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Norwegian and Arab communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (3.7% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 52.2%), family poverty (6.9% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 34.1%), and receiving food stamps (9.0% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 28.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (12.9% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 0.31%), single female poverty (20.8% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 0.56%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.7% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 1.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Norwegian and Arab communities in the United States are seen in female unemployment (4.2% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 28.0%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (4.4% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 26.8%), and unemployment (4.2% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 26.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.8% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 3.3%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.0% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 8.2%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.7% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 8.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Norwegian and Arab communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (46.2% compared to 36.8%, a difference of 25.4%), in labor force | age 20-24 (80.1% compared to 74.6%, a difference of 7.4%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (84.4% compared to 82.4%, a difference of 2.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.7% compared to 65.2%, a difference of 0.70%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.7% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 1.7%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (85.6% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 2.2%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Norwegian and Arab communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.4% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 12.9%), single mother households (5.5% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 10.2%), and currently married (50.2% compared to 47.0%, a difference of 6.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.9% compared to 64.1%, a difference of 0.25%), births to unmarried women (29.3% compared to 29.2%, a difference of 0.53%), and family households with children (27.4% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 2.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Norwegian and Arab communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 62.6%), 4 or more vehicles in household (8.0% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 32.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.9% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 26.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (93.7% compared to 89.6%, a difference of 4.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (62.8% compared to 55.0%, a difference of 14.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.9% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 26.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Norwegian and Arab communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.3% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 55.8%), professional degree (4.2% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 20.4%), and master's degree (14.0% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 19.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of college, 1 year or more (61.7% compared to 61.6%, a difference of 0.14%), nursery school (98.7% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.82%), and kindergarten (98.7% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.83%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Norwegian and Arab communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.7% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 37.3%), hearing disability (3.7% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 24.1%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.6% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 17.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ambulatory disability (5.9% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 0.31%), disability age 65 to 74 (22.5% compared to 22.8%, a difference of 1.2%), and vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 2.7%).