Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago vs Arab Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 216,616,215 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Arabs within Immigrant from Trinidad and Tobago communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.251. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.077% in Arabs. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago corresponds to a decrease of 77.1 Arabs.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago and Arab communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (19.3% compared to 26.6%, a difference of 37.6%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($91,347 compared to $104,566, a difference of 14.5%), and median family income ($93,988 compared to $106,952, a difference of 13.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($40,895 compared to $40,718, a difference of 0.44%), householder income under 25 years ($52,437 compared to $51,219, a difference of 2.4%), and median earnings ($45,729 compared to $48,599, a difference of 6.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago and Arab communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (15.8% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 37.5%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (14.1% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 30.9%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (15.7% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 29.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (12.9% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 0.34%), single female poverty (20.9% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 1.0%), and single father poverty (16.8% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago and Arab communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (23.1% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 34.0%), male unemployment (6.7% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 24.9%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (14.6% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 24.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.0% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 1.2%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.1% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 2.2%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.5% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago and Arab communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (30.2% compared to 36.8%, a difference of 22.1%), in labor force | age 20-24 (71.1% compared to 74.6%, a difference of 5.0%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.4% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 0.70%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (84.3% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 0.040%), in labor force | age 20-64 (78.8% compared to 79.2%, a difference of 0.50%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.0% compared to 82.4%, a difference of 0.53%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago and Arab communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.6% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 26.2%), births to unmarried women (36.3% compared to 29.2%, a difference of 24.4%), and married-couple households (41.2% compared to 46.9%, a difference of 13.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.2% compared to 64.1%, a difference of 0.17%), single father households (2.2% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 1.6%), and average family size (3.33 compared to 3.23, a difference of 3.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago and Arab communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (24.6% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 135.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (4.1% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 47.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (13.3% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 41.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (76.8% compared to 89.6%, a difference of 16.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (40.3% compared to 55.0%, a difference of 36.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (13.3% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 41.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago and Arab communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 41.9%), professional degree (3.9% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 29.8%), and no schooling completed (2.6% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 25.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.4% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.57%), kindergarten (97.3% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.58%), and 1st grade (97.3% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.59%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago and Arab communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.5% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 19.5%), ambulatory disability (6.7% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 12.5%), and self-care disability (2.7% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 10.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male disability (10.9% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 0.58%), disability age over 75 (47.6% compared to 47.1%, a difference of 1.2%), and cognitive disability (17.6% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 1.5%).