Chinese In Labor Force | Age 25-29
COMPARE
Chinese
Select to Compare
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Chinese In Labor Force | Age 25-29
84.3%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE 25-29
12.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
210th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Chinese In Labor Force | Age 25-29 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 64,804,747 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Chinese and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 25 and 29 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.071 and weighted average of 84.3%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chinese within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.47% in labor force participation rate among population between the ages 25 and 29.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Chinese and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 25 and 29 does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Chinese influences an upward or downward trend in the level of labor force participation rate among population between the ages 25 and 29 within an area, or if Chinese simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of labor force participation rate among population between the ages 25 and 29 due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Chinese by In Labor Force | Age 25-29
In terms of in labor force | age 25-29, the demographic groups most similar to Chinese are Immigrants from Jordan (84.4%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Venezuela (84.3%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Armenia (84.4%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Indonesia (84.4%, a difference of 0.010%), and Subsaharan African (84.3%, a difference of 0.020%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | In Labor Force | Age 25-29 |
| Immigrants from Afghanistan | 15.6 /100 | #203 | Poor 84.4% |
| Venezuelans | 15.1 /100 | #204 | Poor 84.4% |
| Ecuadorians | 14.8 /100 | #205 | Poor 84.4% |
| Immigrants from Cambodia | 14.3 /100 | #206 | Poor 84.4% |
| Immigrants from Armenia | 13.3 /100 | #207 | Poor 84.4% |
| Immigrants from Indonesia | 13.2 /100 | #208 | Poor 84.4% |
| Immigrants from Jordan | 12.8 /100 | #209 | Poor 84.4% |
| Chinese | 12.7 /100 | #210 | Poor 84.3% |
| Immigrants from Venezuela | 12.6 /100 | #211 | Poor 84.3% |
| Sub-Saharan Africans | 11.7 /100 | #212 | Poor 84.3% |
| Japanese | 11.4 /100 | #213 | Poor 84.3% |
| Lebanese | 11.1 /100 | #214 | Poor 84.3% |
| Immigrants from Syria | 10.7 /100 | #215 | Poor 84.3% |
| Israelis | 9.3 /100 | #216 | Tragic 84.3% |
| Immigrants from Ecuador | 9.3 /100 | #217 | Tragic 84.3% |
Chinese In Labor Force | Age 25-29 Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Chinese Data | In Labor Force | Age 25-29 Data |
| Minimum | 0.0087% | 56.3% |
| Maximum | 8.3% | 100.0% |
| Range | 8.3% | 43.7% |
| Mean | 1.6% | 83.8% |
| Median | 1.2% | 85.3% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 0.58% | 82.3% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 2.0% | 88.8% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.5% | 6.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.6% | 10.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.6% | 10.8% |
Correlation Details
| Chinese Percentile | Sample Size | In Labor Force | Age 25-29 |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.0087% | 53,055,746 | 84.8% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.059% | 5,055,740 | 84.5% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.10% | 1,538,210 | 82.2% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.14% | 1,149,266 | 82.5% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.19% | 529,051 | 84.9% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.22% | 242,519 | 88.0% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.27% | 241,739 | 86.1% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.31% | 264,410 | 86.4% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.35% | 172,813 | 87.2% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.39% | 107,016 | 85.4% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.43% | 144,779 | 83.8% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.47% | 76,192 | 84.5% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.52% | 117,219 | 80.1% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.56% | 79,978 | 79.6% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.60% | 263,904 | 83.3% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.64% | 104,383 | 74.8% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.70% | 114,487 | 82.0% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.72% | 82,656 | 82.4% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.78% | 454,777 | 84.4% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.82% | 24,095 | 88.5% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.84% | 151,355 | 86.1% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.89% | 78,354 | 79.1% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.98% | 40,323 | 88.9% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.00% | 54,182 | 84.3% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.05% | 13,292 | 66.5% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.09% | 39,437 | 84.1% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.12% | 22,864 | 91.8% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.17% | 30,508 | 87.0% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.21% | 77,415 | 84.7% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.27% | 54,362 | 90.0% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.33% | 27,739 | 89.6% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.37% | 11,138 | 87.9% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.44% | 50,142 | 88.7% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.57% | 27,423 | 90.3% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.63% | 45,392 | 84.0% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.67% | 48,494 | 86.0% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.70% | 18,802 | 87.1% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.77% | 35,493 | 86.4% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.84% | 41,560 | 85.2% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.87% | 10,801 | 61.0% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.94% | 465 | 100.0% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.95% | 8,543 | 56.6% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.14% | 63,439 | 86.7% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.19% | 1,555 | 97.0% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.26% | 1,507 | 90.7% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.28% | 1,576 | 95.5% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.52% | 159 | 56.3% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.61% | 8,571 | 61.8% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.08% | 130 | 56.3% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.23% | 279 | 100.0% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.50% | 686 | 100.0% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.04% | 4,135 | 58.6% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.14% | 9,571 | 94.7% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.98% | 5,065 | 100.0% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.68% | 853 | 73.8% |
[ 8.0% - 8.5% ] 8.28% | 157 | 100.0% |