Chinese Single Father Poverty
COMPARE
Chinese
Select to Compare
Single Father Poverty
Chinese Single Father Poverty
15.4%
POVERTY | SINGLE FATHERS
99.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
83rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Chinese Single Father Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 60,120,579 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Chinese and poverty level among single fathers in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.233 and weighted average of 15.4%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chinese within a typical geography, there is an increase of 4.5% in poverty level among single fathers.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Chinese and poverty level among single fathers does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Chinese influences an upward or downward trend in the level of poverty level among single fathers within an area, or if Chinese simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of poverty level among single fathers due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Chinese by Single Father Poverty
In terms of single father poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chinese are Immigrants from Ukraine (15.4%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Congo (15.4%, a difference of 0.10%), Armenian (15.4%, a difference of 0.12%), Peruvian (15.4%, a difference of 0.14%), and Immigrants from Oceania (15.4%, a difference of 0.25%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Father Poverty |
| Immigrants from Japan | 99.5 /100 | #76 | Exceptional 15.3% |
| Immigrants from Peru | 99.5 /100 | #77 | Exceptional 15.3% |
| Tlingit-Haida | 99.5 /100 | #78 | Exceptional 15.3% |
| Immigrants from Northern Africa | 99.5 /100 | #79 | Exceptional 15.3% |
| Armenians | 99.4 /100 | #80 | Exceptional 15.4% |
| Immigrants from Congo | 99.4 /100 | #81 | Exceptional 15.4% |
| Immigrants from Ukraine | 99.4 /100 | #82 | Exceptional 15.4% |
| Chinese | 99.3 /100 | #83 | Exceptional 15.4% |
| Peruvians | 99.2 /100 | #84 | Exceptional 15.4% |
| Immigrants from Oceania | 99.1 /100 | #85 | Exceptional 15.4% |
| Immigrants from Russia | 99.0 /100 | #86 | Exceptional 15.5% |
| Brazilians | 99.0 /100 | #87 | Exceptional 15.5% |
| Burmese | 99.0 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 15.5% |
| Immigrants from Korea | 99.0 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 15.5% |
| Mexican American Indians | 98.7 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 15.5% |
Chinese Single Father Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Chinese Data | Single Father Poverty Data |
| Minimum | 0.0083% | 0.92% |
| Maximum | 4.1% | 85.0% |
| Range | 4.1% | 84.1% |
| Mean | 1.1% | 19.0% |
| Median | 0.86% | 14.7% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 0.43% | 8.1% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 1.6% | 23.5% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.1% | 15.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 0.88% | 17.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 0.87% | 16.8% |
Correlation Details
| Chinese Percentile | Sample Size | Single Father Poverty |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.0083% | 51,353,148 | 14.3% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.059% | 3,612,052 | 14.1% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.100% | 1,250,386 | 17.3% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.14% | 761,372 | 18.0% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.19% | 427,869 | 24.9% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.22% | 231,572 | 15.3% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.27% | 152,114 | 11.2% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.31% | 167,844 | 20.1% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.35% | 150,999 | 11.5% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.39% | 73,655 | 18.3% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.43% | 117,985 | 23.5% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.47% | 50,408 | 22.5% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.52% | 87,015 | 22.7% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.56% | 52,999 | 35.4% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.60% | 199,142 | 8.6% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.66% | 30,780 | 5.3% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.70% | 72,636 | 10.7% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.72% | 69,615 | 23.5% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.78% | 422,063 | 22.2% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.82% | 9,914 | 28.5% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.83% | 143,651 | 11.1% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.89% | 77,352 | 7.4% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.98% | 40,323 | 3.8% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.00% | 50,280 | 15.2% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.09% | 37,134 | 55.3% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.18% | 24,765 | 6.5% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.21% | 60,825 | 9.1% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.27% | 54,362 | 3.6% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.33% | 25,957 | 0.92% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.37% | 11,138 | 7.2% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.45% | 45,038 | 26.5% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.57% | 27,423 | 4.9% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.63% | 38,674 | 8.1% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.67% | 48,494 | 8.1% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.70% | 18,802 | 12.4% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.84% | 41,560 | 9.5% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.87% | 10,110 | 28.5% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.14% | 55,888 | 7.2% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.19% | 1,555 | 72.7% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.28% | 482 | 85.0% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.39% | 3,627 | 26.2% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.14% | 9,571 | 22.8% |