Bhutanese vs Yuman Community Comparison

COMPARE

Bhutanese
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHonduranHopiHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Yuman
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Bhutanese

Yuman

Exceptional
Tragic
10,144
SOCIAL INDEX
98.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
3rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
959
SOCIAL INDEX
7.1/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
331st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Yuman Integration in Bhutanese Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 40,190,309 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Yuman within Bhutanese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.414. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Bhutanese within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.004% in Yuman. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Bhutanese corresponds to an increase of 3.6 Yuman.
Bhutanese Integration in Yuman Communities

Bhutanese vs Yuman Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Yuman communities in the United States are seen in median family income ($119,800 compared to $78,055, a difference of 53.5%), per capita income ($49,894 compared to $33,236, a difference of 50.1%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($109,520 compared to $72,956, a difference of 50.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($57,078 compared to $50,933, a difference of 12.1%), wage/income gap (27.0% compared to 23.3%, a difference of 15.6%), and median female earnings ($43,648 compared to $35,377, a difference of 23.4%).
Bhutanese vs Yuman Income
Income MetricBhutaneseYuman
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$49,894
Tragic
$33,236
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$119,800
Tragic
$78,055
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$100,151
Tragic
$68,743
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$52,297
Tragic
$39,523
Median Male Earnings
Exceptional
$61,759
Tragic
$45,446
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$43,648
Tragic
$35,377
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$57,078
Tragic
$50,933
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$109,520
Tragic
$72,956
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$117,750
Tragic
$82,139
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$72,288
Tragic
$53,110
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
27.0%
Exceptional
23.3%

Bhutanese vs Yuman Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Yuman communities in the United States are seen in child poverty among boys under 16 (12.6% compared to 30.6%, a difference of 143.3%), married-couple family poverty (4.1% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 137.7%), and family poverty (7.0% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 136.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (18.2% compared to 24.0%, a difference of 31.7%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.3% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 39.9%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.6% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 45.6%).
Bhutanese vs Yuman Poverty
Poverty MetricBhutaneseYuman
Poverty
Exceptional
10.4%
Tragic
20.2%
Families
Exceptional
7.0%
Tragic
16.6%
Males
Exceptional
9.5%
Tragic
19.5%
Females
Exceptional
11.3%
Tragic
20.8%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
18.2%
Tragic
24.0%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
11.4%
Tragic
22.9%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
13.4%
Tragic
29.5%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
12.5%
Tragic
28.9%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
12.6%
Tragic
30.6%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
12.7%
Tragic
27.1%
Single Males
Exceptional
11.1%
Tragic
21.3%
Single Females
Exceptional
17.7%
Tragic
29.4%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
15.0%
Tragic
28.4%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
25.6%
Tragic
37.8%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.1%
Tragic
9.7%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
9.3%
Tragic
13.1%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
10.6%
Tragic
15.4%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
9.2%
Tragic
20.2%

Bhutanese vs Yuman Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Yuman communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 288.3%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.2% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 128.7%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.4% compared to 37.4%, a difference of 128.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.8% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 20.2%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.0% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 20.8%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.0% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 24.3%).
Bhutanese vs Yuman Unemployment
Unemployment MetricBhutaneseYuman
Unemployment
Exceptional
4.9%
Tragic
9.1%
Males
Exceptional
4.9%
Tragic
8.6%
Females
Exceptional
4.9%
Tragic
9.6%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
11.2%
Tragic
16.3%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
16.4%
Tragic
37.4%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
10.0%
Tragic
15.8%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.2%
Tragic
11.0%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.2%
Tragic
10.6%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.4%
Tragic
16.9%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.2%
Tragic
9.5%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.6%
Tragic
6.1%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.5%
Tragic
6.8%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.0%
Tragic
6.2%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
4.8%
Tragic
5.8%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
8.0%
Exceptional
6.7%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
6.7%
Tragic
14.6%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.1%
Tragic
14.8%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
5.0%
Tragic
9.8%

Bhutanese vs Yuman Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Yuman communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.3% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 31.2%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 74.7%, a difference of 13.3%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.5% compared to 57.8%, a difference of 13.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.8% compared to 79.3%, a difference of 6.9%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.4% compared to 70.3%, a difference of 7.4%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.5% compared to 76.3%, a difference of 9.4%).
Bhutanese vs Yuman Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricBhutaneseYuman
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Excellent
65.5%
Tragic
57.8%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
80.2%
Tragic
71.7%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Fair
36.3%
Tragic
27.7%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Excellent
75.4%
Tragic
70.3%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Good
84.8%
Tragic
79.3%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Excellent
85.0%
Tragic
77.1%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Excellent
84.7%
Tragic
74.7%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
83.5%
Tragic
76.3%

Bhutanese vs Yuman Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Yuman communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.3% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 82.5%), births to unmarried women (27.9% compared to 44.4%, a difference of 59.2%), and single father households (2.1% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 55.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.9% compared to 69.3%, a difference of 5.2%), average family size (3.25 compared to 3.47, a difference of 6.7%), and family households with children (27.3% compared to 29.5%, a difference of 8.1%).
Bhutanese vs Yuman Family Structure
Family Structure MetricBhutaneseYuman
Family Households
Exceptional
65.9%
Exceptional
69.3%
Family Households with Children
Fair
27.3%
Exceptional
29.5%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
49.3%
Tragic
43.3%
Average Family Size
Excellent
3.25
Exceptional
3.47
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.1%
Tragic
3.3%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.3%
Tragic
9.6%
Currently Married
Exceptional
48.6%
Tragic
42.6%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
11.2%
Tragic
12.6%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
27.9%
Tragic
44.4%

Bhutanese vs Yuman Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Yuman communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.7% compared to 14.9%, a difference of 70.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 20.4%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (59.1% compared to 51.7%, a difference of 14.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.4% compared to 85.5%, a difference of 6.9%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 19.9%, a difference of 11.7%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (59.1% compared to 51.7%, a difference of 14.2%).
Bhutanese vs Yuman Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricBhutaneseYuman
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
8.7%
Tragic
14.9%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
91.4%
Tragic
85.5%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
59.1%
Tragic
51.7%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
22.2%
Good
19.9%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.8%
Good
6.5%

Bhutanese vs Yuman Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Yuman communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (17.2% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 86.1%), bachelor's degree (42.7% compared to 24.5%, a difference of 73.9%), and professional degree (5.4% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 66.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.2% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.35%), 1st grade (98.2% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.36%), and kindergarten (98.2% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.38%).
Bhutanese vs Yuman Education Level
Education Level MetricBhutaneseYuman
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.8%
Tragic
2.5%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.2%
Fair
97.9%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.2%
Fair
97.9%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Fair
97.8%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Fair
97.8%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Tragic
97.6%
4th Grade
Exceptional
97.9%
Tragic
97.2%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.7%
Tragic
97.0%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.5%
Tragic
96.7%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.6%
Tragic
95.2%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.4%
Tragic
94.9%
9th Grade
Exceptional
95.7%
Tragic
93.8%
10th Grade
Exceptional
94.9%
Tragic
92.0%
11th Grade
Exceptional
94.0%
Tragic
89.7%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
93.0%
Tragic
86.5%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
91.2%
Tragic
84.0%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
88.4%
Tragic
79.2%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
70.3%
Tragic
55.1%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
64.6%
Tragic
48.7%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
51.4%
Tragic
31.3%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
42.7%
Tragic
24.5%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
17.2%
Tragic
9.2%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
5.4%
Tragic
3.3%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.3%
Tragic
1.5%

Bhutanese vs Yuman Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Yuman communities in the United States are seen in disability age 18 to 34 (6.2% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 69.4%), disability age 35 to 64 (9.8% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 60.7%), and vision disability (2.0% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 52.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of hearing disability (3.2% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 5.3%), cognitive disability (16.6% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 9.1%), and self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 9.5%).
Bhutanese vs Yuman Disability
Disability MetricBhutaneseYuman
Disability
Exceptional
11.2%
Tragic
14.6%
Males
Excellent
11.0%
Tragic
14.7%
Females
Exceptional
11.5%
Tragic
14.5%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
1.2%
Exceptional
0.95%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
4.9%
Exceptional
5.4%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Exceptional
6.2%
Tragic
10.6%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
9.8%
Tragic
15.8%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
21.5%
Tragic
31.5%
Age | Over 75 years
Good
47.1%
Tragic
54.4%
Vision
Exceptional
2.0%
Tragic
3.0%
Hearing
Tragic
3.2%
Tragic
3.4%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.6%
Tragic
18.1%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.8%
Tragic
7.9%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.4%
Tragic
2.6%