Immigrants from Central America vs Yuman Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 40,611,990 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Yuman within Immigrant from Central America communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.106. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Central America within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.003% in Yuman. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Central America corresponds to an increase of 3.3 Yuman.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Central America and Yuman communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($80,012 compared to $72,956, a difference of 9.7%), median family income ($85,050 compared to $78,055, a difference of 9.0%), and median household income ($74,217 compared to $68,743, a difference of 8.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,022 compared to $50,933, a difference of 0.17%), median male earnings ($45,538 compared to $45,446, a difference of 0.20%), and householder income over 65 years ($53,420 compared to $53,110, a difference of 0.58%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Central America and Yuman communities in the United States are seen in single father poverty (16.0% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 77.3%), single male poverty (13.8% compared to 21.3%, a difference of 54.9%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (21.3% compared to 30.6%, a difference of 44.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (15.0% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 2.9%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (13.6% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 4.3%), and single mother poverty (33.6% compared to 37.8%, a difference of 12.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Central America and Yuman communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.3% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 219.0%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (18.9% compared to 37.4%, a difference of 98.0%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (5.0% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 90.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.7% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 2.1%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.9% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 5.4%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.3% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 15.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Central America and Yuman communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.0% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 26.4%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.7% compared to 57.8%, a difference of 12.0%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (82.0% compared to 74.7%, a difference of 9.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (82.4% compared to 79.3%, a difference of 3.9%), in labor force | age 45-54 (80.2% compared to 76.3%, a difference of 5.1%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (75.0% compared to 70.3%, a difference of 6.8%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Central America and Yuman communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (8.1% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 19.7%), births to unmarried women (37.4% compared to 44.4%, a difference of 18.5%), and single father households (3.0% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 9.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.49 compared to 3.47, a difference of 0.81%), family households (68.3% compared to 69.3%, a difference of 1.5%), and currently married (44.1% compared to 42.6%, a difference of 3.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Central America and Yuman communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.9% compared to 14.9%, a difference of 66.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (8.5% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 30.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.4% compared to 19.9%, a difference of 17.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.1% compared to 85.5%, a difference of 6.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.6% compared to 51.7%, a difference of 13.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.4% compared to 19.9%, a difference of 17.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Central America and Yuman communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.6% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 45.4%), doctorate degree (1.2% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 29.2%), and professional degree (2.9% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 14.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of college, 1 year or more (48.5% compared to 48.7%, a difference of 0.50%), college, under 1 year (54.4% compared to 55.1%, a difference of 1.2%), and kindergarten (96.4% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Central America and Yuman communities in the United States are seen in disability age 18 to 34 (6.5% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 63.3%), disability age 35 to 64 (11.9% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 33.0%), and male disability (11.3% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 30.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 0.97%), cognitive disability (17.7% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 1.9%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.6% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 3.2%).