Luxembourger vs Polish Community Comparison

COMPARE

Luxembourger
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Polish
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Luxembourgers

Poles

Excellent
Excellent
9,215
SOCIAL INDEX
89.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
27th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
8,413
SOCIAL INDEX
81.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
72nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Polish Integration in Luxembourger Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 144,539,085 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Poles within Luxembourger communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.242. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Luxembourgers within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.150% in Poles. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Luxembourgers corresponds to a decrease of 149.9 Poles.
Luxembourger Integration in Polish Communities

Luxembourger vs Polish Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Polish communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (27.4% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 4.1%), householder income under 25 years ($50,379 compared to $52,407, a difference of 4.0%), and median male earnings ($56,300 compared to $58,139, a difference of 3.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of per capita income ($45,663 compared to $46,123, a difference of 1.0%), householder income over 65 years ($60,967 compared to $61,598, a difference of 1.0%), and median female earnings ($39,891 compared to $40,371, a difference of 1.2%).
Luxembourger vs Polish Income
Income MetricLuxembourgerPolish
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$45,663
Exceptional
$46,123
Median Family Income
Excellent
$106,183
Exceptional
$108,507
Median Household Income
Good
$86,418
Excellent
$88,472
Median Earnings
Excellent
$47,640
Exceptional
$48,659
Median Male Earnings
Excellent
$56,300
Exceptional
$58,139
Median Female Earnings
Average
$39,891
Excellent
$40,371
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$50,379
Good
$52,407
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Excellent
$97,237
Exceptional
$99,685
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Excellent
$103,536
Exceptional
$105,952
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Average
$60,967
Good
$61,598
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
27.4%
Tragic
28.5%

Luxembourger vs Polish Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Polish communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.9% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 11.2%), receiving food stamps (9.1% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 9.2%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.1% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 5.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (28.5% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 0.53%), child poverty among girls under 16 (14.3% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 0.93%), and female poverty (11.6% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 1.0%).
Luxembourger vs Polish Poverty
Poverty MetricLuxembourgerPolish
Poverty
Exceptional
10.6%
Exceptional
10.7%
Families
Exceptional
7.2%
Exceptional
7.4%
Males
Exceptional
9.5%
Exceptional
9.7%
Females
Exceptional
11.6%
Exceptional
11.7%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
20.9%
Exceptional
18.8%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
12.1%
Exceptional
12.7%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
14.9%
Exceptional
15.7%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.6%
Exceptional
14.0%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.8%
Exceptional
14.4%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.3%
Exceptional
14.4%
Single Males
Tragic
13.4%
Poor
13.0%
Single Females
Excellent
20.4%
Exceptional
20.0%
Single Fathers
Tragic
17.1%
Tragic
17.3%
Single Mothers
Excellent
28.5%
Exceptional
28.4%
Married Couples
Exceptional
3.9%
Exceptional
4.0%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
9.2%
Exceptional
9.1%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
10.8%
Exceptional
10.6%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
9.1%
Exceptional
10.0%

Luxembourger vs Polish Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Polish communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.7% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 34.1%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.6% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 18.5%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.3% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 13.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 0.080%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.2% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 0.40%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.2% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 2.4%).
Luxembourger vs Polish Unemployment
Unemployment MetricLuxembourgerPolish
Unemployment
Exceptional
4.3%
Exceptional
4.7%
Males
Exceptional
4.5%
Exceptional
4.9%
Females
Exceptional
4.4%
Exceptional
4.7%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
10.0%
Exceptional
11.0%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
15.1%
Exceptional
16.4%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.1%
Exceptional
10.0%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.2%
Good
6.5%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
4.8%
Good
5.3%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.3%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.2%
Exceptional
4.2%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.5%
Exceptional
4.7%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.3%
Exceptional
4.7%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.2%
Good
5.3%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
4.8%
Excellent
5.1%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
7.7%
Tragic
10.3%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
6.6%
Poor
7.9%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.3%
Tragic
9.4%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
5.0%
Exceptional
5.0%

Luxembourger vs Polish Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Polish communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (45.3% compared to 42.1%, a difference of 7.5%), in labor force | age > 16 (66.7% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 3.2%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (81.9% compared to 80.1%, a difference of 2.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (86.9% compared to 85.8%, a difference of 1.3%), in labor force | age 30-34 (86.6% compared to 85.5%, a difference of 1.3%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (86.4% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 1.4%).
Luxembourger vs Polish Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricLuxembourgerPolish
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
66.7%
Tragic
64.7%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
81.9%
Exceptional
80.1%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
45.3%
Exceptional
42.1%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
79.0%
Exceptional
77.6%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
86.9%
Exceptional
85.8%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
86.6%
Exceptional
85.5%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
86.4%
Exceptional
85.2%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
85.0%
Exceptional
83.6%

Luxembourger vs Polish Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Polish communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (11.3% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 5.0%), births to unmarried women (29.4% compared to 30.8%, a difference of 4.7%), and family households with children (27.0% compared to 26.5%, a difference of 2.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (48.5% compared to 48.5%, a difference of 0.14%), single mother households (5.6% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 0.23%), and average family size (3.10 compared to 3.09, a difference of 0.32%).
Luxembourger vs Polish Family Structure
Family Structure MetricLuxembourgerPolish
Family Households
Tragic
63.3%
Poor
64.0%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
27.0%
Tragic
26.5%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
48.5%
Exceptional
48.5%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.10
Tragic
3.09
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.2%
Exceptional
2.2%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.6%
Exceptional
5.6%
Currently Married
Exceptional
49.3%
Exceptional
48.9%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
11.3%
Good
11.9%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
29.4%
Good
30.8%

Luxembourger vs Polish Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Polish communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (5.4% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 57.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 4.0%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (94.8% compared to 91.7%, a difference of 3.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (59.1% compared to 58.3%, a difference of 1.3%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.9% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 3.3%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (94.8% compared to 91.7%, a difference of 3.4%).
Luxembourger vs Polish Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricLuxembourgerPolish
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
5.4%
Exceptional
8.4%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
94.8%
Exceptional
91.7%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
59.1%
Exceptional
58.3%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
20.9%
Excellent
20.2%
4+ Vehicles Available
Excellent
6.6%
Average
6.4%

Luxembourger vs Polish Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Polish communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 10.5%), master's degree (15.3% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 2.6%), and college, 1 year or more (62.1% compared to 60.7%, a difference of 2.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (98.5% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.11%), nursery school (98.5% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.12%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.12%).
Luxembourger vs Polish Education Level
Education Level MetricLuxembourgerPolish
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.6%
Exceptional
1.4%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.5%
Exceptional
98.6%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.5%
Exceptional
98.6%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.5%
Exceptional
98.6%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Exceptional
98.5%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
98.5%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.4%
5th Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Exceptional
98.3%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.9%
Exceptional
98.1%
7th Grade
Exceptional
97.2%
Exceptional
97.6%
8th Grade
Exceptional
97.0%
Exceptional
97.4%
9th Grade
Exceptional
96.3%
Exceptional
96.7%
10th Grade
Exceptional
95.4%
Exceptional
95.8%
11th Grade
Exceptional
94.5%
Exceptional
94.8%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
93.3%
Exceptional
93.5%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
91.7%
Exceptional
91.9%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
88.6%
Exceptional
88.5%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
68.2%
Excellent
66.9%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
62.1%
Excellent
60.7%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
48.9%
Excellent
48.0%
Bachelor's Degree
Excellent
39.8%
Good
39.1%
Master's Degree
Good
15.3%
Excellent
15.7%
Professional Degree
Good
4.6%
Good
4.6%
Doctorate Degree
Excellent
1.9%
Good
1.9%

Luxembourger vs Polish Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Polish communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 20.8%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.3% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 11.8%), and ambulatory disability (5.6% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 11.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.4% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 0.050%), disability age over 75 (44.8% compared to 45.3%, a difference of 1.2%), and disability age 65 to 74 (21.4% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 3.1%).
Luxembourger vs Polish Disability
Disability MetricLuxembourgerPolish
Disability
Exceptional
11.3%
Tragic
12.2%
Males
Good
11.1%
Tragic
12.0%
Females
Exceptional
11.6%
Tragic
12.5%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.3%
Tragic
1.6%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
5.3%
Tragic
5.9%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
6.9%
Tragic
7.2%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
10.6%
Average
11.3%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
21.4%
Exceptional
22.0%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
44.8%
Exceptional
45.3%
Vision
Exceptional
1.9%
Exceptional
2.1%
Hearing
Tragic
3.2%
Tragic
3.4%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.4%
Exceptional
16.4%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.6%
Fair
6.2%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.2%
Excellent
2.4%