Pima vs Polish Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 61,311,092 people shows a substantial negative correlation between the proportion of Poles within Pima communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.591. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Pima within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.014% in Poles. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Pima corresponds to a decrease of 13.6 Poles.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Pima and Polish communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($30,644 compared to $46,123, a difference of 50.5%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($73,365 compared to $105,952, a difference of 44.4%), and median family income ($77,431 compared to $108,507, a difference of 40.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,503 compared to $52,407, a difference of 1.8%), median female earnings ($35,326 compared to $40,371, a difference of 14.3%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($82,821 compared to $99,685, a difference of 20.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Pima and Polish communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (11.4% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 183.4%), family poverty (18.4% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 147.0%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (23.9% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 125.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (14.8% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 17.3%), single mother poverty (38.6% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 36.0%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (28.4% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 51.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Pima and Polish communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (11.8% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 166.3%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (11.7% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 134.6%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (18.9% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 101.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 2.0%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.2% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 11.9%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (6.3% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 23.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Pima and Polish communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.1% compared to 42.1%, a difference of 23.6%), in labor force | age 20-64 (69.0% compared to 80.1%, a difference of 16.0%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (74.3% compared to 85.8%, a difference of 15.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (79.0% compared to 85.5%, a difference of 8.2%), in labor force | age 20-24 (69.0% compared to 77.6%, a difference of 12.5%), and in labor force | age > 16 (57.4% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 12.7%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Pima and Polish communities in the United States are seen in single father households (4.2% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 90.2%), births to unmarried women (51.5% compared to 30.8%, a difference of 67.1%), and single mother households (8.3% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 48.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.1% compared to 26.5%, a difference of 2.4%), family households (65.9% compared to 64.0%, a difference of 3.0%), and divorced or separated (12.9% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 8.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Pima and Polish communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 67.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 23.5%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (52.0% compared to 58.3%, a difference of 12.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (86.3% compared to 91.7%, a difference of 6.2%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.0% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 9.0%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (52.0% compared to 58.3%, a difference of 12.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Pima and Polish communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (9.2% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 70.3%), bachelor's degree (23.2% compared to 39.1%, a difference of 68.5%), and associate's degree (30.2% compared to 48.0%, a difference of 58.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.2% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.39%), kindergarten (98.2% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.39%), and 1st grade (98.2% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.39%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Pima and Polish communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (38.6% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 75.1%), vision disability (3.3% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 59.9%), and disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 49.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (6.2% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 4.9%), male disability (12.8% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 7.1%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.7% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 7.6%).