Immigrants from Central America vs Palestinian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 213,727,293 people shows a substantial negative correlation between the proportion of Palestinians within Immigrant from Central America communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.559. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Central America within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.003% in Palestinians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Central America corresponds to a decrease of 2.8 Palestinians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Central America and Palestinian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($34,974 compared to $45,790, a difference of 30.9%), median family income ($85,050 compared to $109,413, a difference of 28.6%), and median male earnings ($45,538 compared to $57,778, a difference of 26.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,022 compared to $51,515, a difference of 0.97%), wage/income gap (24.6% compared to 26.1%, a difference of 6.0%), and householder income over 65 years ($53,420 compared to $63,800, a difference of 19.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Central America and Palestinian communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (7.4% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 52.8%), family poverty (12.1% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 45.5%), and receiving food stamps (15.0% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 45.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (16.0% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 0.86%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.2% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 7.4%), and single male poverty (13.8% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 8.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Central America and Palestinian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.5% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 25.1%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.9% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 22.8%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.3% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 22.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.7% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 0.85%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.1% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 2.8%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.5% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 4.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Central America and Palestinian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.0% compared to 36.8%, a difference of 5.3%), in labor force | age 45-54 (80.2% compared to 83.3%, a difference of 3.9%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (82.0% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 3.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.0% compared to 75.6%, a difference of 0.82%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.7% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 1.8%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (82.4% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 2.7%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Central America and Palestinian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.0% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 39.3%), single mother households (8.1% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 36.8%), and births to unmarried women (37.4% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 31.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (68.3% compared to 65.1%, a difference of 5.0%), married-couple households (45.7% compared to 48.0%, a difference of 5.0%), and divorced or separated (12.1% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 5.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Central America and Palestinian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (8.5% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 31.9%), 3 or more vehicles in household (23.4% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 16.6%), and no vehicles in household (8.9% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 7.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.1% compared to 91.7%, a difference of 0.64%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.6% compared to 57.7%, a difference of 1.6%), and no vehicles in household (8.9% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 7.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Central America and Palestinian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.6% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 88.1%), doctorate degree (1.2% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 68.9%), and professional degree (2.9% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 66.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (96.4% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 1.8%), kindergarten (96.4% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 1.8%), and 1st grade (96.3% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Central America and Palestinian communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.5% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 21.6%), disability age 65 to 74 (26.6% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 19.8%), and disability age 35 to 64 (11.9% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 14.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of hearing disability (3.0% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 0.99%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.5% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 1.5%), and disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 1.7%).