Immigrants from Guatemala vs Palestinian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 186,898,793 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Palestinians within Immigrant from Guatemala communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.096. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Guatemala within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.008% in Palestinians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Guatemala corresponds to an increase of 7.6 Palestinians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guatemala and Palestinian communities in the United States are seen in median family income ($87,191 compared to $109,413, a difference of 25.5%), median male earnings ($46,244 compared to $57,778, a difference of 24.9%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($86,573 compared to $107,721, a difference of 24.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,447 compared to $51,515, a difference of 0.13%), wage/income gap (22.5% compared to 26.1%, a difference of 16.4%), and median female earnings ($35,444 compared to $41,484, a difference of 17.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guatemala and Palestinian communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (7.2% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 47.8%), child poverty among girls under 16 (21.9% compared to 15.1%, a difference of 44.6%), and family poverty (12.0% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 43.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (16.6% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 4.6%), single male poverty (13.8% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 8.3%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.9% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 10.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guatemala and Palestinian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.4% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 22.4%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.6% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 19.8%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.2% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 19.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.5% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 1.1%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (12.1% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 2.6%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.4% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 4.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guatemala and Palestinian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.3% compared to 36.8%, a difference of 4.3%), in labor force | age 45-54 (81.1% compared to 83.3%, a difference of 2.7%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (82.9% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 2.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.6% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 0.37%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.3% compared to 75.6%, a difference of 0.40%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (83.6% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guatemala and Palestinian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.0% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 38.9%), births to unmarried women (37.5% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 31.9%), and single mother households (7.7% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 31.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.0% compared to 65.1%, a difference of 0.040%), family households with children (28.8% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 2.6%), and average family size (3.41 compared to 3.23, a difference of 5.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guatemala and Palestinian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.2% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 34.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (53.5% compared to 57.7%, a difference of 7.9%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 6.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (19.7% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 1.9%), 1 or more vehicles in household (88.9% compared to 91.7%, a difference of 3.2%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 6.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guatemala and Palestinian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.6% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 86.1%), doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 44.3%), and master's degree (11.6% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 40.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (96.4% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 1.7%), kindergarten (96.4% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 1.7%), and 1st grade (96.4% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guatemala and Palestinian communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.4% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 16.8%), disability age 65 to 74 (25.7% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 15.5%), and disability age 35 to 64 (11.6% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 12.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 18 to 34 (6.3% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 1.1%), disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 1.9%), and male disability (11.0% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 3.6%).