South American Indian vs Palestinian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 112,773,326 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Palestinians within South American Indian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.054. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in South American Indians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.020% in Palestinians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 South American Indians corresponds to an increase of 20.0 Palestinians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between South American Indian and Palestinian communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($101,171 compared to $107,721, a difference of 6.5%), median male earnings ($54,508 compared to $57,778, a difference of 6.0%), and median family income ($103,624 compared to $109,413, a difference of 5.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($96,497 compared to $98,777, a difference of 2.4%), householder income over 65 years ($62,215 compared to $63,800, a difference of 2.5%), and householder income under 25 years ($52,979 compared to $51,515, a difference of 2.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between South American Indian and Palestinian communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (11.9% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 15.0%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.4% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 14.2%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.9% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 13.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.7% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 1.0%), single male poverty (12.1% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 4.9%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.1% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 6.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between South American Indian and Palestinian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.2% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 13.9%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.5% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 10.4%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.9% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 10.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.0% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 0.050%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 1.1%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.8% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between South American Indian and Palestinian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.8% compared to 36.8%, a difference of 3.0%), in labor force | age 45-54 (82.9% compared to 83.3%, a difference of 0.53%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (75.3% compared to 75.6%, a difference of 0.45%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.5% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.18%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.5% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.20%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.7% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 0.20%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between South American Indian and Palestinian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (31.7% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 11.7%), single mother households (6.4% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 9.2%), and single father households (2.3% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 4.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (28.0% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 0.40%), family households (64.6% compared to 65.1%, a difference of 0.69%), and average family size (3.26 compared to 3.23, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between South American Indian and Palestinian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (12.1% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 44.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (53.9% compared to 57.7%, a difference of 7.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.1% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 5.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (6.3% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 2.6%), 1 or more vehicles in household (88.0% compared to 91.7%, a difference of 4.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.1% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 5.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between South American Indian and Palestinian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.2% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 16.5%), college, under 1 year (65.5% compared to 67.9%, a difference of 3.6%), and bachelor's degree (39.3% compared to 40.7%, a difference of 3.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.8% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.31%), kindergarten (97.8% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.32%), and 1st grade (97.7% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.32%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between South American Indian and Palestinian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 6.9%), vision disability (2.2% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 6.3%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.5% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 5.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 18 to 34 (6.4% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 0.33%), disability age over 75 (47.1% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 1.7%), and hearing disability (2.9% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 2.1%).