Czechoslovakian vs Iraqi Community Comparison

COMPARE

Czechoslovakian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Iraqi
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Czechoslovakians

Iraqis

Good
Average
7,027
SOCIAL INDEX
67.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
132nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
5,167
SOCIAL INDEX
49.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
183rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Iraqi Integration in Czechoslovakian Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,069,962 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Iraqis within Czechoslovakian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.409. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Czechoslovakians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.095% in Iraqis. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Czechoslovakians corresponds to an increase of 95.1 Iraqis.
Czechoslovakian Integration in Iraqi Communities

Czechoslovakian vs Iraqi Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Iraqi communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (28.2% compared to 26.6%, a difference of 5.8%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($95,070 compared to $90,764, a difference of 4.7%), and median family income ($103,273 compared to $100,658, a difference of 2.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($38,738 compared to $38,666, a difference of 0.19%), householder income over 65 years ($60,581 compared to $60,466, a difference of 0.19%), and householder income under 25 years ($51,224 compared to $50,802, a difference of 0.83%).
Czechoslovakian vs Iraqi Income
Income MetricCzechoslovakianIraqi
Per Capita Income
Average
$43,806
Fair
$42,760
Median Family Income
Average
$103,273
Fair
$100,658
Median Household Income
Average
$84,965
Fair
$83,753
Median Earnings
Average
$46,658
Fair
$46,140
Median Male Earnings
Good
$55,382
Average
$54,182
Median Female Earnings
Poor
$38,738
Poor
$38,666
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$51,224
Tragic
$50,802
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Average
$95,070
Poor
$90,764
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Good
$101,387
Fair
$99,387
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Average
$60,581
Fair
$60,466
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
28.2%
Poor
26.6%

Czechoslovakian vs Iraqi Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Iraqi communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.4% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 34.8%), receiving food stamps (10.3% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 18.2%), and family poverty (8.0% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 16.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.0% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 0.92%), single female poverty (21.3% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 2.4%), and single mother poverty (29.7% compared to 28.8%, a difference of 3.1%).
Czechoslovakian vs Iraqi Poverty
Poverty MetricCzechoslovakianIraqi
Poverty
Exceptional
11.4%
Fair
12.7%
Families
Exceptional
8.0%
Fair
9.3%
Males
Exceptional
10.3%
Poor
11.7%
Females
Exceptional
12.4%
Fair
13.7%
Females 18 to 24 years
Good
20.0%
Average
20.2%
Females 25 to 34 years
Fair
13.7%
Good
13.2%
Children Under 5 years
Good
16.8%
Poor
18.0%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
15.1%
Tragic
17.5%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
15.3%
Tragic
17.7%
Girls Under 16 years
Excellent
15.5%
Poor
17.4%
Single Males
Tragic
13.4%
Exceptional
12.3%
Single Females
Fair
21.3%
Good
20.8%
Single Fathers
Tragic
17.1%
Exceptional
15.9%
Single Mothers
Poor
29.7%
Good
28.8%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.4%
Tragic
5.9%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
9.5%
Excellent
10.6%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
10.9%
Excellent
11.7%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
10.3%
Fair
12.2%

Czechoslovakian vs Iraqi Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Iraqi communities in the United States are seen in female unemployment (4.8% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 14.1%), unemployment (4.8% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 12.5%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.2% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 11.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.5% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 0.44%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.6% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 1.5%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.6% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 2.4%).
Czechoslovakian vs Iraqi Unemployment
Unemployment MetricCzechoslovakianIraqi
Unemployment
Exceptional
4.8%
Poor
5.4%
Males
Exceptional
5.0%
Fair
5.4%
Females
Exceptional
4.8%
Tragic
5.5%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
11.0%
Good
11.5%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
16.5%
Exceptional
16.4%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.9%
Average
10.3%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Average
6.7%
Exceptional
6.4%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Good
5.4%
Exceptional
5.2%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Excellent
4.6%
Average
4.7%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.2%
Tragic
4.7%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.6%
Exceptional
4.7%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.6%
Exceptional
4.5%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Excellent
5.3%
Exceptional
4.9%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
5.0%
Exceptional
4.7%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
9.4%
Tragic
9.9%
Women w/ Children < 6
Fair
7.7%
Exceptional
7.3%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Fair
9.1%
Exceptional
8.4%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
5.1%
Fair
5.5%

Czechoslovakian vs Iraqi Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Iraqi communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (41.9% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 8.4%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.3% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 2.1%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (77.5% compared to 76.0%, a difference of 2.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (79.5% compared to 79.3%, a difference of 0.26%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.0% compared to 82.2%, a difference of 0.87%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.6% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 0.96%).
Czechoslovakian vs Iraqi Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricCzechoslovakianIraqi
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
64.3%
Exceptional
65.7%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Average
79.5%
Poor
79.3%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
41.9%
Exceptional
38.6%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
77.5%
Exceptional
76.0%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
85.0%
Tragic
83.9%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Good
84.8%
Tragic
83.8%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Excellent
84.6%
Tragic
83.8%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Good
83.0%
Tragic
82.2%

Czechoslovakian vs Iraqi Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Iraqi communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (32.0% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 16.2%), single father households (2.3% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 7.2%), and family households with children (27.0% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 5.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.6% compared to 64.4%, a difference of 0.43%), average family size (3.13 compared to 3.24, a difference of 3.5%), and married-couple households (48.5% compared to 46.9%, a difference of 3.6%).
Czechoslovakian vs Iraqi Family Structure
Family Structure MetricCzechoslovakianIraqi
Family Households
Excellent
64.6%
Average
64.4%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
27.0%
Exceptional
28.5%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
48.5%
Good
46.9%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.13
Good
3.24
Single Father Households
Average
2.3%
Exceptional
2.2%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.9%
Good
6.1%
Currently Married
Exceptional
48.8%
Good
46.9%
Divorced or Separated
Poor
12.3%
Exceptional
11.8%
Births to Unmarried Women
Fair
32.0%
Exceptional
27.6%

Czechoslovakian vs Iraqi Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Iraqi communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.1% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 13.9%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.7% compared to 19.6%, a difference of 10.9%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (59.8% compared to 57.1%, a difference of 4.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 91.9%, a difference of 0.41%), no vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 1.1%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (59.8% compared to 57.1%, a difference of 4.8%).
Czechoslovakian vs Iraqi Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricCzechoslovakianIraqi
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.8%
Exceptional
7.7%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
92.3%
Exceptional
91.9%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
59.8%
Exceptional
57.1%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
21.7%
Average
19.6%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.1%
Fair
6.2%

Czechoslovakian vs Iraqi Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Iraqi communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 45.5%), professional degree (4.2% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 7.9%), and master's degree (14.5% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 6.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.5% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.74%), kindergarten (98.4% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.74%), and 1st grade (98.4% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.75%).
Czechoslovakian vs Iraqi Education Level
Education Level MetricCzechoslovakianIraqi
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.6%
Tragic
2.4%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.5%
Tragic
97.7%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.4%
Tragic
97.7%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Tragic
97.7%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Tragic
97.6%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Tragic
97.5%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Tragic
97.3%
5th Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Poor
97.1%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.8%
Poor
96.8%
7th Grade
Exceptional
97.1%
Average
96.0%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.9%
Average
95.7%
9th Grade
Exceptional
96.1%
Average
94.9%
10th Grade
Exceptional
95.1%
Good
93.9%
11th Grade
Exceptional
94.0%
Good
92.8%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
92.6%
Good
91.5%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
90.9%
Good
89.5%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
87.4%
Good
86.2%
College, Under 1 year
Good
65.8%
Excellent
66.8%
College, 1 year or more
Average
59.4%
Excellent
60.7%
Associate's Degree
Average
46.0%
Good
47.4%
Bachelor's Degree
Fair
37.0%
Good
39.0%
Master's Degree
Fair
14.5%
Good
15.5%
Professional Degree
Fair
4.2%
Good
4.5%
Doctorate Degree
Fair
1.8%
Average
1.8%

Czechoslovakian vs Iraqi Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Iraqi communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.5% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 30.7%), hearing disability (3.6% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 14.6%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.4% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 11.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 35 to 64 (11.8% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 2.3%), vision disability (2.2% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 3.2%), and female disability (12.7% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 3.9%).
Czechoslovakian vs Iraqi Disability
Disability MetricCzechoslovakianIraqi
Disability
Tragic
12.5%
Fair
11.8%
Males
Tragic
12.3%
Fair
11.3%
Females
Tragic
12.7%
Fair
12.3%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.5%
Exceptional
1.2%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
5.9%
Average
5.6%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.4%
Fair
6.7%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
11.8%
Fair
11.5%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Good
23.0%
Tragic
24.2%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
46.6%
Tragic
48.6%
Vision
Fair
2.2%
Good
2.1%
Hearing
Tragic
3.6%
Poor
3.1%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.6%
Tragic
17.8%
Ambulatory
Tragic
6.4%
Good
6.1%
Self-Care
Average
2.5%
Tragic
2.6%