French American Indian vs Immigrants from Sweden Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 73,710,155 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Sweden within French American Indian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.817. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in French American Indians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.107% in Immigrants from Sweden. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 French American Indians corresponds to an increase of 106.9 Immigrants from Sweden.

When considering income, the most significant differences between French American Indian and Immigrants from Sweden communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($40,244 compared to $55,582, a difference of 38.1%), median family income ($92,872 compared to $122,765, a difference of 32.2%), and median household income ($76,387 compared to $100,699, a difference of 31.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($48,977 compared to $53,621, a difference of 9.5%), wage/income gap (25.4% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 10.7%), and median female earnings ($36,920 compared to $44,774, a difference of 21.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between French American Indian and Immigrants from Sweden communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (13.5% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 45.3%), child poverty under the age of 5 (20.8% compared to 15.3%, a difference of 36.6%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (19.2% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 33.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (22.3% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 7.3%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.9% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 11.3%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.5% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 13.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between French American Indian and Immigrants from Sweden communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.2% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 40.2%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.5% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 24.2%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 20.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.7% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 1.2%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.6% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 2.9%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (18.3% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 4.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between French American Indian and Immigrants from Sweden communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.8% compared to 35.9%, a difference of 11.0%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.8% compared to 74.2%, a difference of 3.5%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (80.8% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 2.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.2% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 1.4%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.1% compared to 65.2%, a difference of 1.8%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.1% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between French American Indian and Immigrants from Sweden communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (36.6% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 28.3%), single mother households (6.9% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 28.2%), and single father households (2.6% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 23.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (62.4% compared to 62.5%, a difference of 0.10%), family households with children (26.6% compared to 26.5%, a difference of 0.24%), and average family size (3.20 compared to 3.14, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between French American Indian and Immigrants from Sweden communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 10.7%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.1% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 5.1%), and no vehicles in household (10.4% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 4.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (55.5% compared to 55.2%, a difference of 0.46%), 1 or more vehicles in household (89.8% compared to 89.3%, a difference of 0.53%), and no vehicles in household (10.4% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 4.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between French American Indian and Immigrants from Sweden communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.6% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 81.5%), professional degree (3.8% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 78.2%), and master's degree (12.7% compared to 20.3%, a difference of 59.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.0% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.31%), kindergarten (98.0% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.32%), and 1st grade (98.0% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.32%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between French American Indian and Immigrants from Sweden communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (13.7% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 38.2%), disability age 18 to 34 (8.2% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 28.3%), and disability age 5 to 17 (6.6% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 25.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.3% compared to 45.1%, a difference of 7.1%), cognitive disability (17.9% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 7.4%), and self-care disability (2.7% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 19.5%).