Immigrants from Venezuela vs Immigrants from Sweden Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 130,305,585 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Sweden within Immigrant from Venezuela communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.258. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Venezuela within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.002% in Immigrants from Sweden. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Venezuela corresponds to a decrease of 1.5 Immigrants from Sweden.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Venezuela and Immigrants from Sweden communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($41,727 compared to $55,582, a difference of 33.2%), median family income ($94,904 compared to $122,765, a difference of 29.4%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($87,038 compared to $112,010, a difference of 28.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (26.2% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 7.0%), householder income under 25 years ($50,109 compared to $53,621, a difference of 7.0%), and median female earnings ($37,003 compared to $44,774, a difference of 21.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Venezuela and Immigrants from Sweden communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (5.8% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 33.3%), receiving food stamps (12.3% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 32.6%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.7% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 25.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (12.0% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 1.5%), single mother poverty (28.1% compared to 27.5%, a difference of 2.2%), and single female poverty (20.2% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 4.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Venezuela and Immigrants from Sweden communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (10.2% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 26.4%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.9% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 16.5%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (8.9% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 15.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female unemployment (5.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 0.98%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.9% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 3.7%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.3% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 4.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Venezuela and Immigrants from Sweden communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (33.7% compared to 35.9%, a difference of 6.5%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.0% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 1.9%), and in labor force | age > 16 (66.4% compared to 65.2%, a difference of 1.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (80.1% compared to 79.8%, a difference of 0.41%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.4% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.42%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.7% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 0.89%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Venezuela and Immigrants from Sweden communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.7% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 25.4%), divorced or separated (13.1% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 13.2%), and births to unmarried women (31.7% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 11.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (47.4% compared to 47.2%, a difference of 0.38%), currently married (47.0% compared to 47.8%, a difference of 1.8%), and average family size (3.26 compared to 3.14, a difference of 3.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Venezuela and Immigrants from Sweden communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.1% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 34.3%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.2% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 18.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.7% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 8.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (55.8% compared to 55.2%, a difference of 1.1%), 1 or more vehicles in household (92.0% compared to 89.3%, a difference of 3.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.7% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 8.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Venezuela and Immigrants from Sweden communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.7% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 70.4%), professional degree (4.8% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 38.4%), and master's degree (15.7% compared to 20.3%, a difference of 29.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.0% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.35%), kindergarten (97.9% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.37%), and 1st grade (97.9% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.37%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Venezuela and Immigrants from Sweden communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.6% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 16.1%), disability age 18 to 34 (5.7% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 11.1%), and disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 8.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.5% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 0.66%), self-care disability (2.2% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 1.9%), and ambulatory disability (5.4% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 2.0%).