Immigrants from Eritrea vs Immigrants from Sweden Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 69,610,905 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Sweden within Immigrant from Eritrea communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.401. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Eritrea within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.013% in Immigrants from Sweden. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Eritrea corresponds to a decrease of 12.8 Immigrants from Sweden.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eritrea and Immigrants from Sweden communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (21.4% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 30.9%), per capita income ($44,509 compared to $55,582, a difference of 24.9%), and median male earnings ($53,715 compared to $65,406, a difference of 21.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,574 compared to $53,621, a difference of 4.0%), median female earnings ($41,485 compared to $44,774, a difference of 7.9%), and median earnings ($47,657 compared to $54,478, a difference of 14.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eritrea and Immigrants from Sweden communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (5.9% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 35.1%), child poverty under the age of 16 (18.5% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 30.9%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (18.6% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 29.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.9% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 0.61%), single male poverty (12.1% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 0.68%), and single father poverty (14.8% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 2.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eritrea and Immigrants from Sweden communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.2% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 14.7%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (4.7% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 10.2%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.5% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 8.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.4% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 0.37%), male unemployment (5.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 0.67%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.7% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eritrea and Immigrants from Sweden communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.7% compared to 35.9%, a difference of 7.8%), in labor force | age > 16 (68.9% compared to 65.2%, a difference of 5.6%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (77.0% compared to 74.2%, a difference of 3.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (85.7% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 0.37%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.9% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 0.40%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (85.2% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.48%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eritrea and Immigrants from Sweden communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.7% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 25.4%), single father households (2.5% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 20.7%), and married-couple households (42.1% compared to 47.2%, a difference of 12.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (60.8% compared to 62.5%, a difference of 2.8%), average family size (3.24 compared to 3.14, a difference of 3.4%), and divorced or separated (12.1% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 4.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eritrea and Immigrants from Sweden communities in the United States are seen in 3 or more vehicles in household (17.8% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 7.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.8% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 5.6%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (52.6% compared to 55.2%, a difference of 5.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.4% compared to 89.3%, a difference of 0.18%), no vehicles in household (10.6% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 2.1%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (52.6% compared to 55.2%, a difference of 5.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eritrea and Immigrants from Sweden communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.8% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 59.1%), professional degree (4.8% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 38.6%), and doctorate degree (2.1% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 35.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2nd grade (97.2% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 1.1%), nursery school (97.2% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 1.1%), and kindergarten (97.2% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eritrea and Immigrants from Sweden communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.7% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 11.8%), disability age 65 to 74 (23.4% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 11.4%), and cognitive disability (18.3% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 10.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability (11.0% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 0.18%), ambulatory disability (5.5% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 1.3%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.5% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 1.5%).