Immigrants from Uruguay vs Immigrants from Sweden Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 80,116,797 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Sweden within Immigrant from Uruguay communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.651. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Uruguay within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.333% in Immigrants from Sweden. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Uruguay corresponds to an increase of 333.0 Immigrants from Sweden.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uruguay and Immigrants from Sweden communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($43,997 compared to $55,582, a difference of 26.3%), median family income ($98,205 compared to $122,765, a difference of 25.0%), and median male earnings ($52,860 compared to $65,406, a difference of 23.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($52,302 compared to $53,621, a difference of 2.5%), wage/income gap (24.6% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 14.0%), and median female earnings ($38,945 compared to $44,774, a difference of 15.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uruguay and Immigrants from Sweden communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (12.5% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 35.0%), married-couple family poverty (5.7% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 30.6%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.8% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 26.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.6% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 2.6%), single male poverty (11.9% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 2.7%), and single mother poverty (29.1% compared to 27.5%, a difference of 5.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uruguay and Immigrants from Sweden communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.7% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 16.9%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.9% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 15.1%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.2% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 14.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.6% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 0.21%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.5% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 0.73%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.5% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 0.89%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uruguay and Immigrants from Sweden communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.4% compared to 35.9%, a difference of 4.4%), in labor force | age > 16 (66.0% compared to 65.2%, a difference of 1.2%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.7% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 1.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.6% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.26%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.2% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 0.27%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.1% compared to 79.8%, a difference of 0.35%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uruguay and Immigrants from Sweden communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.7% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 25.6%), births to unmarried women (33.9% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 18.8%), and single father households (2.4% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 16.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.9% compared to 62.5%, a difference of 2.2%), average family size (3.23 compared to 3.14, a difference of 3.0%), and family households with children (27.4% compared to 26.5%, a difference of 3.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uruguay and Immigrants from Sweden communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.4% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 14.0%), 3 or more vehicles in household (17.1% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 12.0%), and no vehicles in household (11.9% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 10.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.1% compared to 89.3%, a difference of 1.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (51.4% compared to 55.2%, a difference of 7.5%), and no vehicles in household (11.9% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 10.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uruguay and Immigrants from Sweden communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.7% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 70.0%), professional degree (4.6% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 46.9%), and master's degree (15.0% compared to 20.3%, a difference of 35.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.7% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.63%), kindergarten (97.7% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.64%), and 1st grade (97.6% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.65%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uruguay and Immigrants from Sweden communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 14.9%), vision disability (2.2% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 13.3%), and hearing disability (2.7% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 9.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male disability (10.8% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 1.1%), cognitive disability (17.0% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 1.8%), and disability (11.3% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 2.8%).