Indian (Asian) vs Immigrants from Saudi Arabia Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 163,129,390 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Saudi Arabia within Indian (Asian) communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.021. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Indians (Asian) within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.000% in Immigrants from Saudi Arabia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Indians (Asian) corresponds to a decrease of 0.1 Immigrants from Saudi Arabia.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Indian (Asian) and Immigrants from Saudi Arabia communities in the United States are seen in householder income under 25 years ($58,239 compared to $46,187, a difference of 26.1%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($119,496 compared to $95,450, a difference of 25.2%), and median household income ($105,262 compared to $86,875, a difference of 21.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (26.4% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 1.1%), householder income over 65 years ($70,238 compared to $63,355, a difference of 10.9%), and median family income ($125,312 compared to $108,544, a difference of 15.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Indian (Asian) and Immigrants from Saudi Arabia communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.6% compared to 25.3%, a difference of 29.0%), child poverty under the age of 5 (13.4% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 28.1%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (11.2% compared to 13.9%, a difference of 24.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.1% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 4.0%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.7% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 4.5%), and married-couple family poverty (4.8% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 5.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Indian (Asian) and Immigrants from Saudi Arabia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.7% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 20.7%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.0% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 15.4%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.3% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 14.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male unemployment (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.36%), unemployment (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.46%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.3% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 0.73%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Indian (Asian) and Immigrants from Saudi Arabia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.9% compared to 37.0%, a difference of 16.3%), in labor force | age 20-24 (71.9% compared to 73.9%, a difference of 2.8%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.5% compared to 66.3%, a difference of 1.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.8% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 0.30%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.9% compared to 79.5%, a difference of 0.49%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.3% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 0.50%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Indian (Asian) and Immigrants from Saudi Arabia communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.1% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 16.1%), births to unmarried women (25.3% compared to 29.1%, a difference of 15.0%), and divorced or separated (10.2% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 9.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.24 compared to 3.17, a difference of 2.4%), family households with children (27.6% compared to 26.9%, a difference of 2.5%), and currently married (48.0% compared to 44.7%, a difference of 7.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Indian (Asian) and Immigrants from Saudi Arabia communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 36.8%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 14.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.1% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 6.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (53.1% compared to 54.2%, a difference of 2.1%), 1 or more vehicles in household (86.0% compared to 89.9%, a difference of 4.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.1% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 6.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Indian (Asian) and Immigrants from Saudi Arabia communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.5% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 33.6%), professional degree (6.5% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 9.9%), and doctorate degree (2.9% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 8.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of college, under 1 year (70.8% compared to 70.4%, a difference of 0.52%), nursery school (97.6% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.55%), and kindergarten (97.6% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.55%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Indian (Asian) and Immigrants from Saudi Arabia communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.0% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 24.5%), disability age 35 to 64 (8.9% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 21.5%), and disability age 5 to 17 (4.6% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 21.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ambulatory disability (5.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.52%), disability age over 75 (46.5% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 0.57%), and hearing disability (2.7% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 1.1%).