Native/Alaskan vs Immigrants from Saudi Arabia Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 161,356,245 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Saudi Arabia within Native/Alaskan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.521. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Natives/Alaskans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.004% in Immigrants from Saudi Arabia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Natives/Alaskans corresponds to an increase of 3.8 Immigrants from Saudi Arabia.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and Immigrants from Saudi Arabia communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($33,279 compared to $46,008, a difference of 38.3%), median family income ($80,908 compared to $108,544, a difference of 34.2%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($79,816 compared to $105,249, a difference of 31.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($47,704 compared to $46,187, a difference of 3.3%), wage/income gap (24.6% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 8.8%), and median female earnings ($33,806 compared to $39,952, a difference of 18.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and Immigrants from Saudi Arabia communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (17.3% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 63.9%), married-couple family poverty (8.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 61.0%), and family poverty (14.3% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 56.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (25.4% compared to 25.3%, a difference of 0.54%), single mother poverty (36.6% compared to 29.2%, a difference of 25.6%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (15.5% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 27.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and Immigrants from Saudi Arabia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (8.2% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 64.9%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (7.3% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 61.4%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (11.5% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 60.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.2% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 10.9%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.8% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 14.4%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (6.0% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 16.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and Immigrants from Saudi Arabia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (60.6% compared to 66.3%, a difference of 9.5%), in labor force | age 20-64 (73.9% compared to 79.5%, a difference of 7.5%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (77.1% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 7.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (36.6% compared to 37.0%, a difference of 1.4%), in labor force | age 20-24 (72.4% compared to 73.9%, a difference of 2.0%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (79.3% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 6.3%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and Immigrants from Saudi Arabia communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.2% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 54.3%), births to unmarried women (43.0% compared to 29.1%, a difference of 47.9%), and single mother households (8.0% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 35.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (43.5% compared to 44.4%, a difference of 2.2%), currently married (42.8% compared to 44.7%, a difference of 4.5%), and family households with children (28.4% compared to 26.9%, a difference of 5.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and Immigrants from Saudi Arabia communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 45.9%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.7% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 26.3%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (57.0% compared to 54.2%, a difference of 5.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.8% compared to 89.9%, a difference of 0.050%), no vehicles in household (10.5% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 2.1%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (57.0% compared to 54.2%, a difference of 5.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and Immigrants from Saudi Arabia communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.3% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 102.4%), professional degree (3.0% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 100.8%), and master's degree (9.9% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 91.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.0% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.20%), kindergarten (98.0% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.20%), and 1st grade (97.9% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.20%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and Immigrants from Saudi Arabia communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.9% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 55.7%), hearing disability (4.2% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 53.4%), and vision disability (3.0% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 48.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.1% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 5.1%), disability age 5 to 17 (6.3% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 13.7%), and disability age over 75 (53.1% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 14.7%).