Immigrants from Laos vs Immigrants from Saudi Arabia Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 106,699,502 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Saudi Arabia within Immigrant from Laos communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.008. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Laos within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.001% in Immigrants from Saudi Arabia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Laos corresponds to a decrease of 0.8 Immigrants from Saudi Arabia.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Laos and Immigrants from Saudi Arabia communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($37,857 compared to $46,008, a difference of 21.5%), median family income ($92,239 compared to $108,544, a difference of 17.7%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($90,909 compared to $105,249, a difference of 15.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($50,041 compared to $46,187, a difference of 8.3%), median female earnings ($36,841 compared to $39,952, a difference of 8.4%), and median household income ($78,327 compared to $86,875, a difference of 10.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Laos and Immigrants from Saudi Arabia communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (13.8% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 30.6%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.6% compared to 25.3%, a difference of 22.4%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (18.9% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 16.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of poverty (13.8% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 0.24%), male poverty (12.6% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 0.25%), and female poverty (15.0% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 0.96%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Laos and Immigrants from Saudi Arabia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.2% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 14.2%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.5% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 9.4%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.6% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 6.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.1% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 0.99%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.6% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 1.4%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Laos and Immigrants from Saudi Arabia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.6% compared to 37.0%, a difference of 9.7%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.4% compared to 73.9%, a difference of 4.7%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (81.6% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 1.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (79.4% compared to 79.5%, a difference of 0.16%), in labor force | age > 16 (66.0% compared to 66.3%, a difference of 0.50%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.8% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 0.58%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Laos and Immigrants from Saudi Arabia communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.9% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 37.7%), single mother households (7.7% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 29.3%), and births to unmarried women (34.0% compared to 29.1%, a difference of 17.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (45.0% compared to 44.7%, a difference of 0.69%), married-couple households (45.1% compared to 44.4%, a difference of 1.6%), and average family size (3.34 compared to 3.17, a difference of 5.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Laos and Immigrants from Saudi Arabia communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 37.2%), no vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 25.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.4% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 24.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.8% compared to 89.9%, a difference of 2.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.2% compared to 54.2%, a difference of 9.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.4% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 24.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Laos and Immigrants from Saudi Arabia communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 94.8%), professional degree (3.2% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 82.9%), and no schooling completed (3.1% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 70.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (96.9% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 1.3%), kindergarten (96.9% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 1.3%), and 1st grade (96.8% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Laos and Immigrants from Saudi Arabia communities in the United States are seen in self-care disability (2.7% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 21.1%), disability age 35 to 64 (13.0% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 20.6%), and disability age 65 to 74 (26.1% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 17.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 0.62%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.8% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 5.0%), and cognitive disability (18.1% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 5.5%).