British West Indian vs Immigrants from Saudi Arabia Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 87,924,263 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Saudi Arabia within British West Indian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.043. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in British West Indians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.003% in Immigrants from Saudi Arabia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 British West Indians corresponds to a decrease of 2.5 Immigrants from Saudi Arabia.

When considering income, the most significant differences between British West Indian and Immigrants from Saudi Arabia communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (18.0% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 48.5%), householder income over 65 years ($51,463 compared to $63,355, a difference of 23.1%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($85,571 compared to $105,249, a difference of 23.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($40,299 compared to $39,952, a difference of 0.87%), median earnings ($44,552 compared to $47,704, a difference of 7.1%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($85,565 compared to $95,450, a difference of 11.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between British West Indian and Immigrants from Saudi Arabia communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (17.9% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 69.7%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (15.6% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 46.2%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (17.4% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 42.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (17.7% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 4.3%), single male poverty (13.4% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 4.5%), and single female poverty (22.8% compared to 21.3%, a difference of 7.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between British West Indian and Immigrants from Saudi Arabia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (13.7% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 41.7%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (24.0% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 41.2%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (7.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 41.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.7% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 3.9%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.8% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 12.3%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.8% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 14.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between British West Indian and Immigrants from Saudi Arabia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (29.1% compared to 37.0%, a difference of 27.3%), in labor force | age 20-24 (70.0% compared to 73.9%, a difference of 5.6%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.4% compared to 66.3%, a difference of 3.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.0% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 0.69%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.0% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 1.1%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (83.2% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between British West Indian and Immigrants from Saudi Arabia communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (8.4% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 41.4%), births to unmarried women (38.0% compared to 29.1%, a difference of 30.7%), and married-couple households (38.3% compared to 44.4%, a difference of 15.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (62.8% compared to 60.7%, a difference of 3.4%), family households with children (26.0% compared to 26.9%, a difference of 3.4%), and average family size (3.32 compared to 3.17, a difference of 4.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between British West Indian and Immigrants from Saudi Arabia communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (29.7% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 189.3%), 4 or more vehicles in household (3.5% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 62.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (11.4% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 57.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (70.4% compared to 89.9%, a difference of 27.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (35.4% compared to 54.2%, a difference of 53.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (11.4% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 57.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between British West Indian and Immigrants from Saudi Arabia communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 83.9%), professional degree (3.8% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 55.6%), and no schooling completed (2.7% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 47.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.3% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.91%), kindergarten (97.3% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.92%), and 1st grade (97.2% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.93%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between British West Indian and Immigrants from Saudi Arabia communities in the United States are seen in ambulatory disability (7.0% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 29.2%), self-care disability (2.8% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 27.8%), and disability age under 5 (0.99% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 25.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (5.8% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 4.6%), cognitive disability (18.2% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 4.7%), and disability age over 75 (48.7% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 5.3%).