Immigrants from Malaysia vs Immigrants from Portugal Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 107,843,816 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Portugal within Immigrant from Malaysia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.390. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Malaysia within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.118% in Immigrants from Portugal. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Malaysia corresponds to an increase of 118.3 Immigrants from Portugal.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Malaysia and Immigrants from Portugal communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($49,983 compared to $42,412, a difference of 17.8%), householder income over 65 years ($65,497 compared to $55,924, a difference of 17.1%), and median family income ($115,880 compared to $100,984, a difference of 14.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($54,179 compared to $54,105, a difference of 0.14%), wage/income gap (26.3% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 1.6%), and median female earnings ($43,835 compared to $39,788, a difference of 10.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Malaysia and Immigrants from Portugal communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (10.4% compared to 14.3%, a difference of 37.4%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.5% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 23.8%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.4% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 16.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male poverty (11.0% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 1.0%), poverty (12.0% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 2.4%), and single male poverty (12.0% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 3.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Malaysia and Immigrants from Portugal communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.9% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 33.7%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.4% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 29.8%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.0% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 24.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.2% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 3.1%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.0% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 4.3%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.3% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 6.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Malaysia and Immigrants from Portugal communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.3% compared to 39.7%, a difference of 15.7%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.3% compared to 75.8%, a difference of 3.4%), and in labor force | age > 16 (66.1% compared to 65.0%, a difference of 1.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.6% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 0.28%), in labor force | age 25-29 (85.0% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 0.53%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.1% compared to 79.3%, a difference of 1.0%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Malaysia and Immigrants from Portugal communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (27.4% compared to 36.2%, a difference of 32.2%), single father households (2.0% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 29.0%), and single mother households (5.7% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 27.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.9% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 0.81%), average family size (3.22 compared to 3.18, a difference of 1.2%), and family households (64.0% compared to 65.2%, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Malaysia and Immigrants from Portugal communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (13.6% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 15.8%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.9% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 3.8%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (86.5% compared to 88.3%, a difference of 2.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (52.7% compared to 52.8%, a difference of 0.24%), 3 or more vehicles in household (18.3% compared to 18.6%, a difference of 2.0%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (86.5% compared to 88.3%, a difference of 2.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Malaysia and Immigrants from Portugal communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.6% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 69.6%), professional degree (5.7% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 61.1%), and master's degree (18.9% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 49.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.7% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 0.34%), kindergarten (97.7% compared to 97.3%, a difference of 0.34%), and 1st grade (97.6% compared to 97.3%, a difference of 0.34%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Malaysia and Immigrants from Portugal communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 63.6%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.0% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 29.5%), and disability age 35 to 64 (9.7% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 28.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.1% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 0.62%), disability age over 75 (46.4% compared to 47.6%, a difference of 2.7%), and disability age 65 to 74 (21.4% compared to 24.0%, a difference of 12.3%).