Immigrants from Portugal vs Immigrants from Europe Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 174,792,669 people shows a perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Europe within Immigrant from Portugal communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.963. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Portugal within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.852% in Immigrants from Europe. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Portugal corresponds to an increase of 852.3 Immigrants from Europe.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Portugal and Immigrants from Europe communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($42,412 compared to $50,950, a difference of 20.1%), householder income over 65 years ($55,924 compared to $64,828, a difference of 15.9%), and median family income ($100,984 compared to $115,523, a difference of 14.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (26.7% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 1.5%), householder income under 25 years ($54,105 compared to $55,022, a difference of 1.7%), and median female earnings ($39,788 compared to $43,523, a difference of 9.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Portugal and Immigrants from Europe communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (14.3% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 38.0%), child poverty among boys under 16 (17.4% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 19.6%), and family poverty (9.4% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 19.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (12.3% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 1.1%), single father poverty (15.9% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 2.2%), and married-couple family poverty (5.0% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 7.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Portugal and Immigrants from Europe communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.5% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 19.1%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 18.9%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.4% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 17.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.4% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 0.37%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.8% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 0.77%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (12.0% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 2.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Portugal and Immigrants from Europe communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.7% compared to 36.2%, a difference of 9.6%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.0% compared to 85.3%, a difference of 1.5%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (75.8% compared to 74.8%, a difference of 1.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.0% compared to 65.0%, a difference of 0.010%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.4% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 0.54%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.6% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 0.75%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Portugal and Immigrants from Europe communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.6% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 30.5%), single mother households (7.2% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 30.3%), and births to unmarried women (36.2% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 27.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.18 compared to 3.15, a difference of 1.1%), family households (65.2% compared to 63.7%, a difference of 2.4%), and divorced or separated (11.9% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 3.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Portugal and Immigrants from Europe communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.1% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 7.0%), no vehicles in household (11.7% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 6.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.6% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 2.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.3% compared to 87.6%, a difference of 0.84%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.8% compared to 53.2%, a difference of 0.84%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.6% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 2.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Portugal and Immigrants from Europe communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.5% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 58.9%), doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 52.7%), and master's degree (12.6% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 44.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.4% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.81%), kindergarten (97.3% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.81%), and 1st grade (97.3% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.81%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Portugal and Immigrants from Europe communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.8% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 41.0%), disability age 35 to 64 (12.5% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 22.6%), and disability age 5 to 17 (6.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 21.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (47.6% compared to 45.9%, a difference of 3.8%), hearing disability (3.2% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 4.3%), and cognitive disability (17.2% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 4.4%).