Immigrants from Guatemala vs Immigrants from Europe Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 371,632,590 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Europe within Immigrant from Guatemala communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.161. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Guatemala within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.023% in Immigrants from Europe. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Guatemala corresponds to a decrease of 23.0 Immigrants from Europe.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guatemala and Immigrants from Europe communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($37,550 compared to $50,950, a difference of 35.7%), median male earnings ($46,244 compared to $62,057, a difference of 34.2%), and median family income ($87,191 compared to $115,523, a difference of 32.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,447 compared to $55,022, a difference of 7.0%), householder income over 65 years ($53,950 compared to $64,828, a difference of 20.2%), and wage/income gap (22.5% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 20.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guatemala and Immigrants from Europe communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (7.2% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 55.1%), child poverty under the age of 16 (21.6% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 52.1%), and family poverty (12.0% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 51.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (16.6% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 2.1%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.9% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 11.0%), and single male poverty (13.8% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 12.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guatemala and Immigrants from Europe communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 21.1%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.6% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 20.3%), and female unemployment (6.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 19.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.5% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 0.26%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.7% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 1.9%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (12.1% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 4.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guatemala and Immigrants from Europe communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.3% compared to 36.2%, a difference of 2.6%), in labor force | age 45-54 (81.1% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 2.5%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (82.9% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 2.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.3% compared to 74.8%, a difference of 0.70%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.6% compared to 65.0%, a difference of 0.98%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (78.7% compared to 79.9%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guatemala and Immigrants from Europe communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.0% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 48.0%), single mother households (7.7% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 40.1%), and births to unmarried women (37.5% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 31.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.0% compared to 63.7%, a difference of 2.1%), divorced or separated (12.2% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 5.4%), and average family size (3.41 compared to 3.15, a difference of 8.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guatemala and Immigrants from Europe communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 19.3%), no vehicles in household (11.2% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 11.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.7% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 8.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (53.5% compared to 53.2%, a difference of 0.44%), 1 or more vehicles in household (88.9% compared to 87.6%, a difference of 1.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.7% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 8.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guatemala and Immigrants from Europe communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.6% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 88.0%), doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 66.2%), and professional degree (3.4% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 63.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (96.4% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 1.8%), kindergarten (96.4% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 1.8%), and 1st grade (96.4% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guatemala and Immigrants from Europe communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (25.7% compared to 21.6%, a difference of 19.0%), vision disability (2.4% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 15.1%), and disability age 35 to 64 (11.6% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 13.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male disability (11.0% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 0.58%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.3% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 1.0%), and disability (11.6% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 1.5%).