Immigrants from England vs Immigrants from Europe Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 391,908,705 people shows a perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Europe within Immigrant from England communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.972. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from England within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.963% in Immigrants from Europe. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from England corresponds to an increase of 963.0 Immigrants from Europe.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from England and Immigrants from Europe communities in the United States are seen in householder income under 25 years ($51,817 compared to $55,022, a difference of 6.2%), median female earnings ($41,277 compared to $43,523, a difference of 5.4%), and median earnings ($49,722 compared to $52,195, a difference of 5.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($65,715 compared to $64,828, a difference of 1.4%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($109,446 compared to $111,984, a difference of 2.3%), and wage/income gap (27.9% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 2.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from England and Immigrants from Europe communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.2% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 9.2%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.8% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 7.7%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (13.0% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 7.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family poverty (8.0% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 1.1%), female poverty (12.3% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 1.6%), and poverty (11.4% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from England and Immigrants from Europe communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.7% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 6.8%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.3% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 5.2%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.8% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 4.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.9% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 0.79%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.6% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 0.86%), and female unemployment (5.0% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from England and Immigrants from Europe communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.1% compared to 36.2%, a difference of 5.2%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.2% compared to 65.0%, a difference of 1.3%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (75.5% compared to 74.8%, a difference of 0.98%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.7% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 0.51%), in labor force | age 45-54 (82.6% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 0.66%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.7% compared to 85.3%, a difference of 0.73%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from England and Immigrants from Europe communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (31.1% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 9.2%), single father households (2.2% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 8.4%), and divorced or separated (12.1% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 5.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.15 compared to 3.15, a difference of 0.030%), currently married (48.3% compared to 48.1%, a difference of 0.48%), and family households (64.4% compared to 63.7%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from England and Immigrants from Europe communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.7% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 44.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.7% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 17.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.7% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 14.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.4% compared to 87.6%, a difference of 4.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.1% compared to 53.2%, a difference of 9.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.7% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 14.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from England and Immigrants from Europe communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 10.8%), master's degree (17.0% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 7.0%), and professional degree (5.3% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 6.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of college, under 1 year (68.7% compared to 68.8%, a difference of 0.080%), ged/equivalency (87.6% compared to 87.5%, a difference of 0.11%), and nursery school (98.3% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.20%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from England and Immigrants from Europe communities in the United States are seen in disability age 18 to 34 (6.9% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 8.9%), hearing disability (3.3% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 8.6%), and disability age 35 to 64 (11.0% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 7.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.0% compared to 45.9%, a difference of 0.14%), self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 0.23%), and cognitive disability (16.6% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 0.62%).