Immigrants from Uruguay vs Immigrants from Denmark Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 71,711,238 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Denmark within Immigrant from Uruguay communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.420. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Uruguay within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.453% in Immigrants from Denmark. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Uruguay corresponds to an increase of 453.1 Immigrants from Denmark.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uruguay and Immigrants from Denmark communities in the United States are seen in median family income ($98,205 compared to $120,445, a difference of 22.7%), per capita income ($43,997 compared to $53,799, a difference of 22.3%), and median male earnings ($52,860 compared to $64,625, a difference of 22.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($52,302 compared to $52,612, a difference of 0.59%), median female earnings ($38,945 compared to $43,646, a difference of 12.1%), and wage/income gap (24.6% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 15.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uruguay and Immigrants from Denmark communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (12.5% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 30.3%), married-couple family poverty (5.7% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 25.5%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.8% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 23.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single female poverty (20.6% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 0.28%), single mother poverty (29.1% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 1.9%), and single father poverty (15.6% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 7.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uruguay and Immigrants from Denmark communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.9% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 8.5%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.7% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 7.6%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.2% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 6.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.6% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 0.75%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.6% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 0.87%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uruguay and Immigrants from Denmark communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.4% compared to 36.1%, a difference of 4.9%), in labor force | age > 16 (66.0% compared to 64.8%, a difference of 1.8%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.1% compared to 79.4%, a difference of 0.83%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.6% compared to 74.8%, a difference of 0.23%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.6% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 0.34%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.9% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 0.40%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uruguay and Immigrants from Denmark communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.7% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 22.3%), single father households (2.4% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 17.7%), and births to unmarried women (33.9% compared to 29.4%, a difference of 15.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.9% compared to 62.9%, a difference of 1.6%), family households with children (27.4% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 2.4%), and average family size (3.23 compared to 3.15, a difference of 2.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uruguay and Immigrants from Denmark communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.4% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 17.9%), 3 or more vehicles in household (17.1% compared to 19.6%, a difference of 14.6%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (51.4% compared to 55.3%, a difference of 7.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.1% compared to 89.1%, a difference of 1.1%), no vehicles in household (11.9% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 7.5%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (51.4% compared to 55.3%, a difference of 7.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uruguay and Immigrants from Denmark communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.7% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 63.6%), professional degree (4.6% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 40.8%), and no schooling completed (2.3% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 33.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.7% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.64%), kindergarten (97.7% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.64%), and 1st grade (97.6% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.64%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uruguay and Immigrants from Denmark communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.7% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 13.3%), disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 8.9%), and vision disability (2.2% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 7.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 35 to 64 (10.3% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 0.070%), disability (11.3% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 0.25%), and cognitive disability (17.0% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 0.48%).