Immigrants from Uganda vs Immigrants from Denmark Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 72,241,009 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Denmark within Immigrant from Uganda communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.547. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Uganda within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.423% in Immigrants from Denmark. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Uganda corresponds to an increase of 423.4 Immigrants from Denmark.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uganda and Immigrants from Denmark communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($45,043 compared to $53,799, a difference of 19.4%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($95,698 compared to $110,363, a difference of 15.3%), and median male earnings ($56,064 compared to $64,625, a difference of 15.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($52,374 compared to $52,612, a difference of 0.46%), median female earnings ($40,739 compared to $43,646, a difference of 7.1%), and median earnings ($48,041 compared to $53,186, a difference of 10.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uganda and Immigrants from Denmark communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (11.9% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 23.8%), male poverty (11.8% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 14.0%), and married-couple family poverty (5.2% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 14.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (16.7% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 0.070%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.8% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 0.18%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.8% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 0.34%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uganda and Immigrants from Denmark communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (10.7% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 23.0%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.6% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 8.1%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.8% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 7.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female unemployment (5.3% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.26%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.5% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 1.3%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.7% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uganda and Immigrants from Denmark communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.2% compared to 36.1%, a difference of 8.7%), in labor force | age > 16 (67.5% compared to 64.8%, a difference of 4.2%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.7% compared to 79.4%, a difference of 1.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.2% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 0.13%), in labor force | age 35-44 (85.0% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 0.91%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.7% compared to 82.5%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uganda and Immigrants from Denmark communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.6% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 19.3%), single father households (2.4% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 15.5%), and married-couple households (44.6% compared to 47.3%, a difference of 6.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (62.7% compared to 62.9%, a difference of 0.20%), divorced or separated (11.7% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 1.3%), and average family size (3.23 compared to 3.15, a difference of 2.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uganda and Immigrants from Denmark communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.0% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 11.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.9% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 7.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.4% compared to 19.6%, a difference of 6.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (55.0% compared to 55.3%, a difference of 0.67%), 1 or more vehicles in household (90.1% compared to 89.1%, a difference of 1.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.4% compared to 19.6%, a difference of 6.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uganda and Immigrants from Denmark communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.3% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 32.3%), professional degree (5.0% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 27.4%), and doctorate degree (2.2% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 24.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2nd grade (97.8% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.44%), 3rd grade (97.7% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.46%), and nursery school (97.9% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.47%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uganda and Immigrants from Denmark communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.9% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 8.6%), disability age 35 to 64 (11.2% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 8.3%), and cognitive disability (18.1% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 7.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability (11.3% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 0.020%), vision disability (2.1% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 0.36%), and female disability (11.8% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 1.8%).