Immigrants from Turkey vs Immigrants from Denmark Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 101,305,547 people shows a near-perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Denmark within Immigrant from Turkey communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.926. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Turkey within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.995% in Immigrants from Denmark. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Turkey corresponds to an increase of 995.4 Immigrants from Denmark.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Turkey and Immigrants from Denmark communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (27.0% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 5.8%), per capita income ($51,368 compared to $53,799, a difference of 4.7%), and householder income over 65 years ($66,672 compared to $68,801, a difference of 3.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($52,503 compared to $52,612, a difference of 0.21%), median earnings ($52,960 compared to $53,186, a difference of 0.43%), and median female earnings ($44,066 compared to $43,646, a difference of 0.96%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Turkey and Immigrants from Denmark communities in the United States are seen in single father poverty (15.3% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 9.2%), single male poverty (12.1% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 8.8%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (11.9% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 6.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (4.6% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 0.40%), family poverty (8.0% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 0.72%), and female poverty (12.6% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Turkey and Immigrants from Denmark communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.2% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 9.8%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.0% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 9.2%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.3% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 5.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.6% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 0.71%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.3% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 0.72%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.5% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 0.84%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Turkey and Immigrants from Denmark communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.9% compared to 36.1%, a difference of 3.4%), in labor force | age > 16 (66.3% compared to 64.8%, a difference of 2.4%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (73.7% compared to 74.8%, a difference of 1.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.5% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 0.47%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.9% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 0.80%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.4% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 0.99%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Turkey and Immigrants from Denmark communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (28.1% compared to 29.4%, a difference of 4.6%), divorced or separated (11.2% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 3.4%), and single father households (2.0% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 3.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.1% compared to 62.9%, a difference of 0.31%), married-couple households (46.8% compared to 47.3%, a difference of 1.0%), and average family size (3.18 compared to 3.15, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Turkey and Immigrants from Denmark communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.7% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 12.8%), 3 or more vehicles in household (17.9% compared to 19.6%, a difference of 9.7%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (53.6% compared to 55.3%, a difference of 3.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.6% compared to 89.1%, a difference of 0.53%), no vehicles in household (11.5% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 3.2%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (53.6% compared to 55.3%, a difference of 3.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Turkey and Immigrants from Denmark communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.9% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 10.7%), doctorate degree (2.6% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 4.3%), and professional degree (6.2% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 4.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (87.9% compared to 88.0%, a difference of 0.10%), 12th grade, no diploma (92.4% compared to 92.5%, a difference of 0.12%), and high school diploma (90.6% compared to 90.8%, a difference of 0.18%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Turkey and Immigrants from Denmark communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.8% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 12.8%), male disability (10.2% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 8.3%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.1% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 7.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 65 to 74 (21.4% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 0.64%), disability age over 75 (45.9% compared to 45.4%, a difference of 1.0%), and cognitive disability (17.2% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 2.2%).