Immigrants from Russia vs Immigrants from Denmark Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 121,955,013 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Denmark within Immigrant from Russia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.443. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Russia within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.014% in Immigrants from Denmark. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Russia corresponds to an increase of 14.4 Immigrants from Denmark.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Russia and Immigrants from Denmark communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (26.4% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 8.1%), householder income over 65 years ($64,512 compared to $68,801, a difference of 6.7%), and householder income under 25 years ($55,891 compared to $52,612, a difference of 6.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median earnings ($53,457 compared to $53,186, a difference of 0.51%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($108,751 compared to $110,363, a difference of 1.5%), and median male earnings ($63,326 compared to $64,625, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Russia and Immigrants from Denmark communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.4% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 13.9%), receiving food stamps (10.8% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 12.2%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.5% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 11.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty (12.7% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 2.1%), child poverty among boys under 16 (14.7% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 2.1%), and poverty (11.7% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 2.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Russia and Immigrants from Denmark communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.3% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 7.4%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.7% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 7.1%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (18.2% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 4.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.6% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 0.10%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.6% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 0.38%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.4% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 0.53%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Russia and Immigrants from Denmark communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.1% compared to 36.1%, a difference of 5.8%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.5% compared to 74.8%, a difference of 1.8%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.2% compared to 82.5%, a difference of 0.82%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.3% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 0.27%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.9% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 0.37%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.8% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 0.57%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Russia and Immigrants from Denmark communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (27.1% compared to 29.4%, a difference of 8.4%), single father households (2.0% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 5.4%), and divorced or separated (11.3% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 2.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (26.8% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 0.10%), currently married (47.7% compared to 47.6%, a difference of 0.13%), and single mother households (5.5% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 0.19%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Russia and Immigrants from Denmark communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (15.1% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 36.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.3% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 19.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (16.9% compared to 19.6%, a difference of 16.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (85.4% compared to 89.1%, a difference of 4.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (50.3% compared to 55.3%, a difference of 10.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (16.9% compared to 19.6%, a difference of 16.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Russia and Immigrants from Denmark communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.0% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 16.6%), doctorate degree (2.5% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 9.3%), and professional degree (6.0% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 6.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of bachelor's degree (45.4% compared to 45.4%, a difference of 0.030%), associate's degree (53.1% compared to 53.1%, a difference of 0.080%), and nursery school (98.0% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.32%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Russia and Immigrants from Denmark communities in the United States are seen in self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 8.1%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.0% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 7.9%), and hearing disability (2.9% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 7.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 65 to 74 (21.6% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 0.44%), cognitive disability (16.8% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 0.54%), and female disability (11.7% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 0.78%).