Immigrants from Africa vs Immigrants from Croatia Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 129,220,141 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Croatia within Immigrant from Africa communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.072. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Africa within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.001% in Immigrants from Croatia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Africa corresponds to a decrease of 0.6 Immigrants from Croatia.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Africa and Immigrants from Croatia communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($42,950 compared to $50,417, a difference of 17.4%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($90,372 compared to $104,503, a difference of 15.6%), and median male earnings ($53,457 compared to $60,914, a difference of 14.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($59,837 compared to $63,168, a difference of 5.6%), householder income under 25 years ($50,609 compared to $54,343, a difference of 7.4%), and median female earnings ($40,257 compared to $43,258, a difference of 7.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Africa and Immigrants from Croatia communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (12.8% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 28.3%), family poverty (9.9% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 26.4%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (18.1% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 23.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (29.4% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 5.2%), single father poverty (15.8% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 5.2%), and single male poverty (12.7% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 7.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Africa and Immigrants from Croatia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.8% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 12.2%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.7% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 9.4%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (12.1% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 9.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 0.60%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.4% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 1.1%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.2% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Africa and Immigrants from Croatia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.0% compared to 36.1%, a difference of 5.3%), in labor force | age > 16 (67.4% compared to 65.0%, a difference of 3.6%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (75.8% compared to 75.1%, a difference of 1.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (85.2% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 0.020%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.2% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 0.17%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.9% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 0.19%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Africa and Immigrants from Croatia communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.3% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 33.8%), single father households (2.4% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 21.3%), and births to unmarried women (33.0% compared to 29.8%, a difference of 10.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (62.4% compared to 63.1%, a difference of 1.1%), average family size (3.25 compared to 3.14, a difference of 3.5%), and divorced or separated (12.1% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 4.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Africa and Immigrants from Croatia communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.6% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 4.3%), no vehicles in household (12.5% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 4.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.6% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 2.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (51.8% compared to 51.8%, a difference of 0.050%), 1 or more vehicles in household (87.6% compared to 87.0%, a difference of 0.60%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.6% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 2.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Africa and Immigrants from Croatia communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.4% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 27.2%), professional degree (4.6% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 15.6%), and master's degree (15.7% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 10.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.6% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.55%), kindergarten (97.6% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.55%), and 1st grade (97.6% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.55%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Africa and Immigrants from Croatia communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.7% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 13.5%), disability age 35 to 64 (11.5% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 12.9%), and disability age 65 to 74 (23.7% compared to 21.3%, a difference of 11.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability (11.4% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 0.060%), self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 1.0%), and female disability (11.9% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 1.1%).