Immigrants from Micronesia vs Immigrants from Croatia Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 35,445,406 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Croatia within Immigrant from Micronesia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.726. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Micronesia within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.035% in Immigrants from Croatia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Micronesia corresponds to an increase of 34.8 Immigrants from Croatia.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Micronesia and Immigrants from Croatia communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($37,464 compared to $50,417, a difference of 34.6%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($80,544 compared to $104,503, a difference of 29.7%), and median male earnings ($47,177 compared to $60,914, a difference of 29.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($61,000 compared to $63,168, a difference of 3.5%), householder income under 25 years ($50,691 compared to $54,343, a difference of 7.2%), and wage/income gap (24.4% compared to 26.2%, a difference of 7.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Micronesia and Immigrants from Croatia communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (13.5% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 35.8%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (15.8% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 32.2%), and family poverty (9.8% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 24.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.4% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 0.72%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.7% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 4.4%), and single father poverty (18.6% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 12.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Micronesia and Immigrants from Croatia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.1% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 29.1%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.5% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 20.5%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.2% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 19.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.9% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 0.10%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.6% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 0.32%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.0% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Micronesia and Immigrants from Croatia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.2% compared to 36.1%, a difference of 11.2%), in labor force | age 30-34 (82.4% compared to 86.1%, a difference of 4.5%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (77.8% compared to 75.1%, a difference of 3.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (64.7% compared to 65.0%, a difference of 0.47%), in labor force | age 20-64 (78.9% compared to 80.1%, a difference of 1.5%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (83.1% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 2.4%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Micronesia and Immigrants from Croatia communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.6% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 31.2%), single mother households (6.9% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 26.4%), and births to unmarried women (32.9% compared to 29.8%, a difference of 10.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.2% compared to 63.1%, a difference of 1.8%), married-couple households (44.9% compared to 46.7%, a difference of 4.1%), and currently married (45.6% compared to 47.5%, a difference of 4.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Micronesia and Immigrants from Croatia communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 41.5%), no vehicles in household (10.1% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 29.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.7% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 20.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.1% compared to 87.0%, a difference of 3.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.1% compared to 51.8%, a difference of 6.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.7% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 20.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Micronesia and Immigrants from Croatia communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.2% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 62.9%), master's degree (10.8% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 60.5%), and doctorate degree (1.3% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 53.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.0% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.16%), kindergarten (98.0% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.16%), and 1st grade (97.9% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.17%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Micronesia and Immigrants from Croatia communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.0% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 29.1%), disability age 35 to 64 (12.9% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 27.1%), and disability age 65 to 74 (26.1% compared to 21.3%, a difference of 22.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (50.1% compared to 45.5%, a difference of 10.1%), cognitive disability (18.1% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 10.3%), and self-care disability (2.7% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 10.7%).