Japanese vs Immigrants from Croatia Community Comparison

COMPARE

Japanese
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlbanianAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Immigrants from Croatia
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Japanese

Immigrants from Croatia

Fair
Excellent
2,662
SOCIAL INDEX
24.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
248th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
8,526
SOCIAL INDEX
82.7/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
67th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Immigrants from Croatia Integration in Japanese Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 95,663,127 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Croatia within Japanese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.337. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Japanese within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.004% in Immigrants from Croatia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Japanese corresponds to a decrease of 4.2 Immigrants from Croatia.
Japanese Integration in Immigrants from Croatia Communities

Japanese vs Immigrants from Croatia Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Japanese and Immigrants from Croatia communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($39,870 compared to $50,417, a difference of 26.5%), median male earnings ($51,473 compared to $60,914, a difference of 18.3%), and median family income ($97,288 compared to $112,323, a difference of 15.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($52,365 compared to $54,343, a difference of 3.8%), householder income over 65 years ($57,919 compared to $63,168, a difference of 9.1%), and wage/income gap (23.8% compared to 26.2%, a difference of 10.3%).
Japanese vs Immigrants from Croatia Income
Income MetricJapaneseImmigrants from Croatia
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$39,870
Exceptional
$50,417
Median Family Income
Tragic
$97,288
Exceptional
$112,323
Median Household Income
Fair
$83,395
Exceptional
$92,225
Median Earnings
Tragic
$44,825
Exceptional
$51,581
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$51,473
Exceptional
$60,914
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$38,528
Exceptional
$43,258
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Good
$52,365
Exceptional
$54,343
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Poor
$91,624
Exceptional
$104,503
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Poor
$96,834
Exceptional
$108,304
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$57,919
Exceptional
$63,168
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
23.8%
Fair
26.2%

Japanese vs Immigrants from Croatia Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Japanese and Immigrants from Croatia communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (14.1% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 41.6%), family poverty (9.9% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 26.0%), and married-couple family poverty (5.6% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 21.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (28.9% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 3.3%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (18.8% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 5.1%), and single father poverty (15.2% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 8.9%).
Japanese vs Immigrants from Croatia Poverty
Poverty MetricJapaneseImmigrants from Croatia
Poverty
Tragic
13.3%
Exceptional
11.0%
Families
Tragic
9.9%
Exceptional
7.8%
Males
Tragic
12.2%
Exceptional
10.0%
Females
Tragic
14.5%
Exceptional
12.0%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
18.8%
Exceptional
17.9%
Females 25 to 34 years
Poor
14.1%
Exceptional
12.0%
Children Under 5 years
Poor
18.1%
Exceptional
15.6%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
17.7%
Exceptional
14.6%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
17.7%
Exceptional
14.7%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
17.8%
Exceptional
15.1%
Single Males
Poor
13.1%
Exceptional
11.9%
Single Females
Fair
21.3%
Exceptional
18.9%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
15.2%
Poor
16.6%
Single Mothers
Good
28.9%
Exceptional
28.0%
Married Couples
Tragic
5.6%
Exceptional
4.6%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
12.2%
Exceptional
10.3%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
13.3%
Exceptional
11.5%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
14.1%
Exceptional
10.0%

Japanese vs Immigrants from Croatia Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Japanese and Immigrants from Croatia communities in the United States are seen in male unemployment (5.8% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 11.4%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.1% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 10.9%), and unemployment (5.6% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 10.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.3% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 0.15%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 0.18%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.1% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 1.1%).
Japanese vs Immigrants from Croatia Unemployment
Unemployment MetricJapaneseImmigrants from Croatia
Unemployment
Tragic
5.6%
Excellent
5.1%
Males
Tragic
5.8%
Good
5.2%
Females
Tragic
5.6%
Excellent
5.1%
Youth < 25
Fair
11.7%
Exceptional
11.1%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Average
17.6%
Excellent
17.3%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
10.0%
Exceptional
9.9%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
6.9%
Good
6.5%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
5.9%
Good
5.4%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
5.1%
Excellent
4.6%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
4.7%
Good
4.5%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Average
4.8%
Average
4.8%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
5.1%
Tragic
5.0%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.2%
Tragic
5.5%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
4.9%
Tragic
5.3%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
8.3%
Exceptional
8.3%
Women w/ Children < 6
Good
7.5%
Exceptional
7.1%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.4%
Average
8.9%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
5.7%
Exceptional
5.1%

Japanese vs Immigrants from Croatia Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Japanese and Immigrants from Croatia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.5% compared to 36.1%, a difference of 3.9%), in labor force | age 45-54 (81.6% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 2.1%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.3% compared to 86.1%, a difference of 2.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.3% compared to 75.1%, a difference of 0.28%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.3% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 0.99%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.8% compared to 65.0%, a difference of 1.2%).
Japanese vs Immigrants from Croatia Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricJapaneseImmigrants from Croatia
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
65.8%
Fair
65.0%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
79.1%
Exceptional
80.1%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Excellent
37.5%
Fair
36.1%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Good
75.3%
Average
75.1%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Poor
84.3%
Exceptional
85.2%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
84.3%
Exceptional
86.1%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
83.6%
Exceptional
85.1%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
81.6%
Exceptional
83.4%

Japanese vs Immigrants from Croatia Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Japanese and Immigrants from Croatia communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.8% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 40.7%), single mother households (7.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 36.1%), and births to unmarried women (35.2% compared to 29.8%, a difference of 18.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (12.0% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 2.8%), married-couple households (45.2% compared to 46.7%, a difference of 3.3%), and family households (65.9% compared to 63.1%, a difference of 4.5%).
Japanese vs Immigrants from Croatia Family Structure
Family Structure MetricJapaneseImmigrants from Croatia
Family Households
Exceptional
65.9%
Tragic
63.1%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
29.4%
Tragic
25.7%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
45.2%
Good
46.7%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.35
Tragic
3.14
Single Father Households
Tragic
2.8%
Exceptional
2.0%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
7.4%
Exceptional
5.4%
Currently Married
Tragic
44.5%
Excellent
47.5%
Divorced or Separated
Good
12.0%
Exceptional
11.6%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
35.2%
Exceptional
29.8%

Japanese vs Immigrants from Croatia Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Japanese and Immigrants from Croatia communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 43.8%), no vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 38.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.8% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 26.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.6% compared to 87.0%, a difference of 4.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.5% compared to 51.8%, a difference of 11.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.8% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 26.7%).
Japanese vs Immigrants from Croatia Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricJapaneseImmigrants from Croatia
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
9.4%
Tragic
13.0%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
90.6%
Tragic
87.0%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
57.5%
Tragic
51.8%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
21.8%
Tragic
17.2%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.7%
Tragic
5.4%

Japanese vs Immigrants from Croatia Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Japanese and Immigrants from Croatia communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.3% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 76.9%), professional degree (3.5% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 48.6%), and master's degree (12.5% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 38.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (96.7% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 1.5%), kindergarten (96.7% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 1.5%), and 1st grade (96.6% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 1.5%).
Japanese vs Immigrants from Croatia Education Level
Education Level MetricJapaneseImmigrants from Croatia
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
3.3%
Exceptional
1.9%
Nursery School
Tragic
96.7%
Exceptional
98.2%
Kindergarten
Tragic
96.7%
Exceptional
98.1%
1st Grade
Tragic
96.6%
Exceptional
98.1%
2nd Grade
Tragic
96.5%
Exceptional
98.1%
3rd Grade
Tragic
96.4%
Exceptional
98.0%
4th Grade
Tragic
96.0%
Exceptional
97.8%
5th Grade
Tragic
95.7%
Exceptional
97.6%
6th Grade
Tragic
95.4%
Exceptional
97.3%
7th Grade
Tragic
94.0%
Exceptional
96.5%
8th Grade
Tragic
93.6%
Exceptional
96.2%
9th Grade
Tragic
92.6%
Exceptional
95.4%
10th Grade
Tragic
91.2%
Exceptional
94.5%
11th Grade
Tragic
89.9%
Exceptional
93.5%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
88.3%
Exceptional
92.3%
High School Diploma
Tragic
85.9%
Exceptional
90.4%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
82.4%
Exceptional
87.3%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
61.5%
Exceptional
67.8%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
55.2%
Exceptional
62.3%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
41.7%
Exceptional
50.2%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
33.3%
Exceptional
42.3%
Master's Degree
Tragic
12.5%
Exceptional
17.3%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.5%
Exceptional
5.3%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.5%
Exceptional
2.1%

Japanese vs Immigrants from Croatia Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Japanese and Immigrants from Croatia communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (12.3% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 21.5%), disability age 65 to 74 (25.7% compared to 21.3%, a difference of 20.5%), and disability age 5 to 17 (6.1% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 15.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of hearing disability (3.0% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 2.8%), ambulatory disability (6.3% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 4.2%), and male disability (11.7% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 6.6%).
Japanese vs Immigrants from Croatia Disability
Disability MetricJapaneseImmigrants from Croatia
Disability
Tragic
12.2%
Excellent
11.4%
Males
Tragic
11.7%
Good
11.0%
Females
Tragic
12.6%
Exceptional
11.8%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
1.2%
Poor
1.3%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.1%
Exceptional
5.2%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Poor
6.8%
Exceptional
6.2%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
12.3%
Exceptional
10.2%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
25.7%
Exceptional
21.3%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
50.2%
Exceptional
45.5%
Vision
Tragic
2.4%
Exceptional
2.1%
Hearing
Average
3.0%
Fair
3.1%
Cognitive
Tragic
18.3%
Exceptional
16.4%
Ambulatory
Poor
6.3%
Good
6.0%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.7%
Excellent
2.4%