Immigrants from Brazil vs Immigrants from Croatia Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 116,486,478 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Croatia within Immigrant from Brazil communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.090. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Brazil within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.003% in Immigrants from Croatia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Brazil corresponds to a decrease of 3.0 Immigrants from Croatia.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Brazil and Immigrants from Croatia communities in the United States are seen in median female earnings ($41,273 compared to $43,258, a difference of 4.8%), per capita income ($48,164 compared to $50,417, a difference of 4.7%), and median male earnings ($58,324 compared to $60,914, a difference of 4.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($54,487 compared to $54,343, a difference of 0.27%), householder income over 65 years ($62,364 compared to $63,168, a difference of 1.3%), and median household income ($90,907 compared to $92,225, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Brazil and Immigrants from Croatia communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.9% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 12.4%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.3% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 10.1%), and married-couple family poverty (5.0% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 8.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty among girls under 16 (15.1% compared to 15.1%, a difference of 0.20%), single mother poverty (27.9% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 0.24%), and single male poverty (11.7% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 1.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Brazil and Immigrants from Croatia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.7% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 10.6%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.0% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 7.6%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.5% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 5.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.0% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 0.27%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.5% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 0.67%), and male unemployment (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.71%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Brazil and Immigrants from Croatia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.1% compared to 36.1%, a difference of 2.7%), in labor force | age > 16 (66.7% compared to 65.0%, a difference of 2.5%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.5% compared to 86.1%, a difference of 0.75%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (85.0% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 0.080%), in labor force | age 25-29 (85.5% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 0.43%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.9% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 0.61%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Brazil and Immigrants from Croatia communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.1% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 11.8%), single father households (2.2% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 11.2%), and family households with children (27.4% compared to 25.7%, a difference of 6.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of births to unmarried women (29.6% compared to 29.8%, a difference of 0.46%), family households (63.6% compared to 63.1%, a difference of 0.77%), and married-couple households (46.2% compared to 46.7%, a difference of 1.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Brazil and Immigrants from Croatia communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.8% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 21.0%), 1 or more vehicles in household (89.6% compared to 87.0%, a difference of 2.9%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (5.2% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 2.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (17.1% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 0.36%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.8% compared to 51.8%, a difference of 2.0%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (5.2% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Brazil and Immigrants from Croatia communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.1% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 8.4%), doctorate degree (2.2% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 6.5%), and college, under 1 year (66.9% compared to 67.8%, a difference of 1.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.0% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.17%), kindergarten (98.0% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.18%), and 1st grade (97.9% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.19%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Brazil and Immigrants from Croatia communities in the United States are seen in disability age 5 to 17 (5.8% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 11.2%), vision disability (2.2% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 8.4%), and hearing disability (2.9% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 7.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 35 to 64 (10.2% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 0.17%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.3% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 0.21%), and female disability (11.6% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 1.7%).